Yeah, the DNC party of the rich and stupid really doesn't like Freedom.... who would have guessed? LOL



https://thefederalist.com/2024/01/19/sur...n-america/

Quote:The nation’s ruling class holds deeply authoritarian opinions widely divorced from the rest of the American electorate, finds a survey out this week. It found nearly 60 percent of American “elites” think there is too much individual freedom in America. Meanwhile, nearly 60 percent of registered voters have the exact opposite opinion, reporting the United States has too much top-down control, limiting liberty. 

The study, titled “Them Vs. U.S,” defined the American “elite” as “having a postgraduate degree, a household income of more than $150,000 annually, and living in a zip code with more than 10,000 people per square mile.” Such people account for about 1 percent of Americans. The study also examined a sub-sample of the 1 percent who graduated from Ivy League schools or other name-brand institutions such as Northwestern, Duke, Stanford, and the University of Chicago.

The study from the Committee to Unleash Prosperity found ruling class opinions on climate policies were particularly harsh and despotic. More than two-thirds of the 1 percent support rationing vital energy and food sources in an attempt to control the globe’s weather. That number jumped to nearly 90 percent among the Ivy Leaguers. Around two-thirds of normal registered voters, however, oppose rationing vital resources.
Limiting food and water consumption is a serious proposition to global leaders. For example, the C40 Cities Climate Leadership Group, an environmentalist organization of city leaders across the globe, has proposed annihilating meat and dairy consumption by 2030. 
“An astonishing 72% of the Elites – including 81% of the Elites who graduated from the top universities – favor banning gas cars,” the study authors continued. “And majorities of elites would ban gas stoves, non-essential air travel, SUVs, and private air conditioning.”
Elites’ view of other elites is very different from regular registered voters’ view of elites. On the education front, “Two-thirds (67%) [of the 1 percent] say teachers and other educational professionals should decide what children are taught rather than letting parents decide.” Only 38 percent of registered voters felt the same. 

“About six of ten elites have a favorable opinion of the so-called talking professions—lawyers, lobbyists, politicians, and journalists,” wrote the study authors. Additionally, “In stark contrast to the rest of America, 70% of the Elites trust the government to ‘do the right thing most of the time.’”
Unsurprisingly, “about three-quarters of these cultural elites are Biden supporters.” While only 20 percent of Americans say they are better off financially under Biden, nearly three-quarters of the elites say they are better off under Biden.
The study comes as global leaders meet in Davos, Switzerland for the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting to discuss draconian climate policies and crackdowns on freedom of speech and therefore freedom of thought. So far at the conference, elites have discussed establishing a “new world order,” lobbied for censorship in the name of “disinformation and misinformation,” and labeled farming and fishing “ecocide.” 
The WEF policy proposals and the results of this survey reveal what the Committee to Unleash Prosperity describes as a “Grand Canyon-sized chasm” between regular citizens and those who largely claim the expertise and power to rule over others with or without their consent. 

“These results confirm what people have long suspected,” wrote the study authors: “Today, there are two Americas. One is wealthier, more highly educated, and attended the best schools. They put much more trust in big government ‘to do the right thing’ and, by their own admission, benefit from more expansive government policies. They have also been hurt far less by the high inflation of the Biden presidency than those who live from paycheck to paycheck and are in the lower and middle classes.”

Found this gem on another board. Transferring over for review

Quote:ht tps: // ww w. federal register. gov/documents/2023/12/21/2023-27935/institutional-review-board-waiver-or-alteration-of-informed-consent-for-minimal-risk-clinical

(fair use applies) DELIBERATELY BROKEN LINK

EXCERPT (I only posted the summary - the entire piece is at the link)


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.


Publication Date:

12/21/2023


AGENCY:

[b]Food and Drug Administration, HHS.[/b]

ACTION:

[b]Final rule.[/b]

SUMMARY:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA, the Agency, or we) is issuing a final rule to amend its regulations to implement a provision of the 21st Century Cures Act (Cures Act).[b] This final rule allows an exception from the requirement to obtain informed consent when a clinical investigation poses no more than minimal risk to the human subject and includes appropriate safeguards to protect the rights, safety, and welfare of human subjects. The final rule permits an institutional review board (IRB) to waive or alter certain informed consent elements or to waive the requirement to obtain informed consent, under limited conditions, for certain FDA-regulated minimal risk clinical investigations.[/b]

DATES:

[b]This rule is effective January 22, 2024.[/b]

Quote:Have you ever made a prediction and wished you’d recorded it?

Last week, in a phone conversation with a family member, they happened to mention growing their own vegetables, and I said in reply “Enjoy it while you can, they’re gonna start claiming it’s causing climate change soon.”

Literally four days later...



Apparently, a new study from the University of Michigan has found that “urban gardening” is 5 (or maybe 6, they’re not sure) times worse for the environment than “conventional crops”.

I don’t know how they calculated it, and it doesn’t really matter. If you read the bodies of the articles they even say it only applies to some vegetables in some places and it all depends on how the “infrastructure” is put together.

The details aren’t the point. The point is yet another weapon in the war on food. More regulation, more commercialization, less freedom, all in the name of “fighting climate change”.

And if you’re doubting that’s the agenda here, check out the sheer number of government research agencies which the “supported” the research project:

Quote:Support for the project was provided by the UK Economic and Social Research Council, German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, French National Research Agency, U.S. National Science Foundation, Poland’s National Science Centre, and the European Union’s Horizon 202 research and innovation program.

It’s a fairly obvious case of needing a study to support a position, going out and and buying one.

This is one of those stories that exists simply to be a headline, so some pundit can quote it on some political panel on primetime TV and start a conversation about “regulation”.

Since we started with a prediction, let’s end with another one: This is just the first step, and you don’t have to be paying especially close attention to see where it goes from here.

They are never going to make growing your own vegetables illegal, they are just going to make it increasingly difficult.

It will start with licenses, for food safety purposes or something. Maybe an outbreak of a disease will be linked to people sharing food from their allotments.

Licenses will be increasingly expensive, and come with restrictions. You’ll only be allowed to use seeds from specific approved vendors, seeds of GMO plants which “mitigate the impact of climate change”. These seeds will likely be “terminator seeds”, meaning they are sterile in the second generation.

And, in that fashion, growing your own vegetables will no longer be an individual and independent experience, but just another corporate subscription service.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/ho...84473.html

Britain must be prepared to form a “citizen army” of tens of thousands in the event of war with countries such as Russia, the head of the army has warned in an ominous intervention.
General Sir Patrick Sanders said that his forces, including all reserves, would not be large enough to defend the country if there was a war, and it was now essential for Britain to lay the foundations for “national mobilisation”.

Speaking at a conference on armored warfare in southwest London, Gen Sanders said that within three years Britain should be able to increase its army to 120,000, including regular soldiers, reserves and a “strategic reserve” group – which is understood to mean retired troops who have been recalled.


wow.
personally I don't see any chance of Russia - Nato war any time soon.  just not worth it for either side.
If Putin can't take Ukraine why would he try anything bigger?
does anyone think he'd really try to go into Poland?  he would bring the world against himself.

I do not buy into everything about the earth flipping 90 degrees however I would not be surprised if it does happen or has happened in the past. One thing they/Ben did get right IMO is about the Mammoths that were flash frozen with a mouth full of vegetation/food between their teeth.

Things are heating up with the corrupt Feds.

https://twitter.com/GregAbbott_TX/status...4951349275



Democrats call on Biden to Federalize the Texas Guard so that they can re-open the flood gates.

Castro calls on Biden to federalize Texas National Guard

https://www.sacurrent.com/news/san-anton...d-33640489

The whole damned thing is corrupt. GOP attempt to bribe her, all on audio.


https://twitter.com/i/status/1749885512163205344



https://twitter.com/WarClandestine/statu...0802757992

Quote:The Kari Lake/Dewitt phone call is confirmation that:

1- A swamp/deep state exists
2- They fear Trump and his allies
3- They have financial interest in preventing Trump and his allies from holding office
4- They are capable of assassination

This isn’t an election. It’s a war.

I listened to this Marine tell campfire stories in this episode the other night while lying in bed and couldn't fall asleep till after 5am.



0:00 – Introduction
01:04 - Canadian Army, Kandahar
07:14 – U.S. Army, Kunar
10:02 – U.S. Marines, Camp Dwyer
22:58 – Credits/SERE Story

If you've never come across the post office scandal it's one of the most absurd stories of total state abuse and incompetence, that it feels surreal. Over decades this occurred and everyone was gaslit over their false guilt.

Quote:LONDON, Jan 10 (Reuters) - One of Britain's biggest miscarriages of justice, the wrongful conviction of hundreds of Post Office workers due to faulty software, has exploded into the public domain following a TV drama, triggering demands for justice.

In a more than 20-year scandal, some postal workers were sent to prison and others lost their livelihoods and homes.

An independent inquiry as well as a police investigation into the scandal are being carried out, and business executives and former ministers are under scrutiny.

Below is a detailed look at the case:

WHAT IS THE POST OFFICE SCANDAL?

Hundreds of self-employed workers at the state-owned Post Office were wrongly prosecuted or convicted between 1999 and 2015 for false accounting, theft and fraud, because of a glitches in a software system that incorrectly showed money missing from accounts.

Some spent time in jail while others went bankrupt, saw their marriages destroyed and some died before their names were cleared.

Managers at Post Office branches across Britain, called sub-postmasters, are often at the heart of their communities, trusted individuals who handle people's savings and pensions.

The Post Office maintained for years that data from the defective Horizon computer accounting system, developed by Japan's Fujitsu and rolled out in 1999, was reliable, while accusing sub-postmasters of theft.

HOW DID THE SCANDAL UNFOLD?

The issues with Horizon, where the system would incorrectly show shortfalls in the accounts of individual branches, began to be reported to the Post Office from the early 2000s.

Over the next decade, a number of sub-postmasters either found their Post Office contracts terminated, were made bankrupt or were jailed after being found guilty of stealing money.

In 2009, trade publication Computer Weekly reported the claims of flaws with Horizon, alongside the postmaster prosecutions.

Amid mounting pressure from the media and lawmakers, the Post Office began to investigate the issue, but in 2015, its boss Paula Vennells told a parliamentary committee that there had been no evidence of any miscarriage of justice.

WHAT COMPENSATION HAVE VICTIMS RECEIVED?

In late 2019, the Post Office agreed to settle claims made by 555 sub-postmasters. However, many of the victims found the amount paid in compensation was outweighed by legal fees.

The government says roughly 138 million pounds ($175 million) have so far been paid out to over 2,700 claimants across three separate Post Office compensation schemes.

Still, many postmasters are yet to receive compensation or have their convictions quashed.

WHAT IS THE GOVERNMENT DOING?

Spurred to act following a public outcry after the TV drama, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is seeking to use new legislation to overturn the wrongful convictions, calling it one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in Britain's history.

Under the plan, sub-postmasters will be able to sign a document to have their convictions reversed and claim compensation.

But some legal experts have warned that the unprecedented step of legislating to quash convictions meant that politicians were meddling in the independent judicial process, potentially risking similar interference in the future on other issues.

The normal process for anyone to have their conviction overturned in Britain is for the convicted party to lodge an appeal.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

An independent public inquiry led by a former high court judge is gathering evidence from postal workers, the government, the Post Office, Fujitsu and others. The inquiry is expected to conclude later this year.
London's Metropolitan Police has also confirmed it is conducting its own investigation into the Post Office over potential fraud offences arising from the wrongful prosecutions.

HAS ANYONE BEEN HELD ACCOUNTABLE?

No senior Post Office staff have been punished to date.

Vennells, who received more than 4.5 million pounds in salary and bonuses during her seven-year tenure, stepped down in 2019 before the Post Office agreed to pay 58 million pounds in a settlement with 555 sub-postmasters.

In 2021 she resigned from the boards of two retailers after 39 sub-postmasters had their criminal convictions overturned, saying her past at the Post Office had become a distraction.

After a public outcry, Vennells returned her CBE, an honour bestowed in 2019 for services to the Post Office and charity, since the broadcast of "Mr Bates vs The Post Office", the ITV drama about the scandal.
Former postal affairs minister Ed Davey has also come under the spotlight. The now-leader of the small Liberal Democrats party refused to meet sub-postmaster Alan Bates in May 2010, saying in a letter that it would not serve any useful purpose.

Davey, who later met Bates but did not intervene in any of the cases, said he was "clearly misled" by Post Office executives.

Fujitsu, which has continued to win multiple British government contracts, says it is "fully committed" to supporting an ongoing independent public inquiry. It says it has apologised for its role in a scandal.

($1 = 0.7839 pounds)
Reuters

Quote:The Fujitsu boss who told Paula Vennells that the Horizon computer system was as secure as Fort Knox is a top UK chief executive who lives in a £4 million house in north London.

Duncan Tait, the chief executive of Fujitsu UK between 2011 and 2014, made the comment to Vennells, his Post Office counterpart, two sources have confirmed to The Times.

Tait, 57, who declined to apologise in a public statement released last week, is now on a multi-million pound pay deal at Inchcape, a FTSE 250 online car dealership.

Vennells, who led the Post Office between 2010 and 2019, claimed she was told branch accounts could not be changed without the knowledge of postmasters. The conversation with Tait was at the centre of the defence of her actions in the scandal to MPs four years ago.

“I remember being told by Fujitsu’s then CEO when I raised it with him that the system was ‘like Fort Knox’,” Vennells told the business select committee in 2020. “He had been a trusted outsource partner and had the reputation of a highly competent technology sector CEO. His word was important to me.”

Tait’s successor Michael Keegan, the husband of the education secretary, Gillian Keegan, has explicitly denied he made the Fort Knox comment, but Tait has remained silent. In a statement provided by the strategic advisory firm Dentons, he said: “I am appalled by the harsh treatment of the sub-postmasters and fully support the public inquiry. It would be inappropriate for me to comment ahead of this.”

Tait has since claimed he was telling Vennells about Horizon’s ability to resist cyber attacks and was not commenting on remote access, it is understood. The revelation that Tait made the comment sparked anger from MPs. Kevan Jones, a Labour MP and longtime campaigner for postmasters, said: “It was welcome on Friday that current management of Fujitsu were prepared to be open and honest about their role in this scandal. Those in charge at the time now need to come forward and explain exactly what their role was and what they knew, including Mr Tait.”

The comments by Vennells became the opening salvo in a boardroom blame game between bosses of the Post Office and Fujitsu. On Friday, Paul Patterson, the current chief executive of Fujitsu in Europe, accused the Post Office of editing out evidence of Horizon faults in witness statements filed to courts, labelling the withholding of crucial evidence “shameful” and “appalling”.
He said he was “truly sorry” on behalf of the company, but so far executives at the helm at key moments of the scandal, which saw close to 1,000 sub-postmasters convicted based on faulty data from Fujitsu’s IT system, have remained out of the spotlight.

Between 2011 and 2014 there was growing pressure on the Post Office to launch a full, independent investigation into Horizon and the hundreds of prosecutions that relied on its data. In 2013, the Post Office received a legal advice document stating the barrister Simon Clarke’s view that “several” court trials had been misled on Horizon’s reliability. The Detica report, also from 2013, found that the Post Office was unable to account for “significant values” of cash in its network.

Vennells has claimed her confidence in Horizon came from Fujitsu’s top team, saying in another part of her 2020 statement that “the message that the board and I were consistently given by Fujitsu, from the highest levels of the company, was that … it was fundamentally sound”.



In spite of the scandal Tate has remained in top jobs and amassed millions of pounds in pay and bonuses. In the four financial years he was chief executive of Fujitsu Service Limited, the highest-paid director, who is likely to have been Tait, took home £3.2 million in remuneration. When Tait stood down as chief executive, he became the first non-Japanese person to be appointed to the board of Fujitsu Global. He left the firm in 2019.

Accounts for 2020 show that a director — understood to be Tait — received £2.6 million in “compensation for loss of office”. Fujitsu would not confirm who received the money.

His appointment to chief executive of Inchcape, a FTSE 250 online car dealership, was announced in May 2020, and since then Tait has pocketed £4.3 million in pay and bonuses in two financial years.

He now lives with his partner in a four-bedroom terraced home, worth about £4 million, in north London. Inchcape, whose share price is subject to the tides of the stock market, is understood to be watching carefully as attention turns to Fujitsu’s role in the Horizon scandal.

Liam Byrne, the chairman of the business and trade select committee, asked who made the Fort Knox comment in an evidence session last week. “Paula Vennells said that there was a Fujitsu boss who told her that Horizon was ‘like Fort Knox’,” Byrne said. “Do you know who in Fujitsu made that comment?” Nick Read, the chief executive of the Post Office, said: “I don’t know who that was, no. I merely saw the quote in the newspapers.”

The UK Times

Hard to keep it low key with all the paperwork these days.

Quote:For instance, more than 2,200 companies have directors aged 123 years and above, despite the fact that the oldest known human lived to 122, said Richard Graham, a director at Moody’s Analytics, in research published Monday. One listed director — at 942 years old — would have been born in the 11th century.

Atypical directorship is just one of seven key behaviors highlighted in the research, including mass registration, dormancy and circular ownership. While new regulations across the world are looking to improve transparency at shell companies, there is still some way to go, with $1.6 trillion laundered annually, according to data from Moody’s Analytics.

“Organizations today face mounting complexity in understanding true ownership structures and detecting risky corporate relationships,” said Ted Datta, head of the financial crime compliance practice for Europe, Africa and Americas at Moody’s Analytics. “By detecting these discrepancies, we can equip investigators and analysts with the tools to better investigate fraud.”

Findings from its report included a China-based textile and clothing manufacturer that reported over $2 billion revenues in 2019, despite having only one employee. There’s also thousands of examples of directors below the age of five, and 22,000 entities with a registered address at Egypt’s pyramids. Meanwhile, one individual held 5,751 roles at 2,883 different entities.

The study looked at some 472 million companies in November. The country with the highest number of shell company risks was the UK, with almost 5 million flags. Companies registered in the US had the most flags related to financial anomalies, at over 1.25 million. Panama is also a hotspot, with 47% of companies in the jurisdiction raising alarm, though the number of anonymous registrations dropped by half following the Panama Papers investigations.

While shell companies might have legitimate purposes, their opaqueness is often use to hide criminal financial activity, Moody’s Analytics said. Other red governance flags included jurisdictional risk, outlier ultimate beneficial ownership and financial anomalies, it said.