Guess who is coming to dinner? 

Yep, Satan and his angels... but we can escape the insanity.

An interesting video on this scenario coming soon. I am not a date setter but I do find these predictions with dates entertaining. 

125 K, Job reinstatement, Bullcrap negative records wiped, removal of all the school's public posts about it.

Not bad, not bad at all. Finally, sanity is returning.


https://www.theblaze.com/news/travis-bla...settlement?

Quote:"The truth is your son watched my daughter and multiple other girls change in the locker room. While he got a free show, they got violated," Travis Allen said in the post, according to the lawsuit.

The transgender student, a week after the locker room incident, reportedly said "I'm going to f****** kill Blake Allen," the lawsuit also alleged.
"The Vermont School Boards Insurance Trust made the decision concerning the payment in order to cap defense expenses in what would otherwise be years of litigation," Orange Southwest Supervisory District Superintendent Layne Millington said, as the Herald reported.

Quote:That settlement requires that the Vermont School Boards Insurance Trust pay $125,000 in damages and attorneys’ fees and costs to Travis Allen and Jessica Allen, on behalf of their daughter, Blake Allen, and their attorneys with the Alliance Defending Freedom.


Under the settlement, the district will reinstate Travis Allen, the father, as middle school soccer coach, and will scrub any records of discipline against Travis Allen and daughter Blake from school records.

Further, the settlement requires the Orange Southwest School District Board and school officials named in the Allens’ lawsuit to remove any content posted online by the school related to the locker room business as well as from the bulletin board or boards at Randolph Union Middle/High School displaying “love and support” messages to the trans-identifying student.

The Alliance Defending Freedom hailed the settlement as a huge win for the Allen family.

“The settlement of Blake and Travis Allen’s case is a resounding victory for freedom of speech,” Phil Sechler, senior counsel at the Alliance Defending Freedom, told The Daily Signal on Thursday.

“Calling a male a male shouldn’t have cost Travis his job and gotten Blake kicked out of school,” he added. “We are very glad that the school agreed to do the right thing by giving Travis his coaching job back and dropping the discipline against Blake. Everyone has the right to speak freely, and we are grateful that this settlement further protects that right.”

A very long but informative article on the "planned" violence disaster which is being leveraged for gun control. I had done a thread on "another site" which proved Democrats do not want to solve violence as it would interfere with their gun control efforts (yes, they admitted it).

Planned action / reaction in order to implement gun control (on you, not the criminals). 

https://alt-market.us/how-to-solve-viole...k-asylums/

Quote:One of the most common strategies used by the political left to attack 2nd Amendment supporters is to ramp up the anti-gun hype every time a crime involving a gun is committed. They don’t care much about the tragedy itself, they only care about how they can use it for political gain. However, it’s very important to understand that this is not only about removing gun rights for leftists – It’s also about creating a false association in the public consciousness that guns = crime.


That is to say, they want to condition people to believe that once guns are gone, crime and murder will be gone also. But, firearms have been an integral part of American society for hundreds of years, and gun ownership has been present through times of relative peace as well as times of increased violence.

In the case of countries like the UK with incredibly strict gun laws, muggings, rape and homicides have been rising with knife attacks in particular increasing by 80%. While it is technically more difficult to murder a person with a knife, it’s also a lot easier for larger, stronger assailants and gangs to succeed in harming people when those people have no equalizer. Disarmament makes life EASIER for criminals, not harder.

So, if guns are not the catalyst for rising violence, then what is?  In reality, the very people who want guns taken from the hands of law abiding Americans are the same people largely responsible for the spike in homicide rates. Imagine that…

In the US, violent crimes and murders are exponentially higher in Democrat run cities, many of them with increased gun control measures. In fact, of the top 30 most violent cities in the US, 27 of them are Democrat controlled. Wherever leftists dominate politically, violence, theft, rape and murder are sure to follow. Anti-gun proponents often try to cite high homicide numbers in certain conservative states like Texas, but the majority of those crimes are actually committed in cities run by leftists.

The truth is, blue cities are dragging red states and the rest of the country down. According to the statistics, in theory, if the public was to replace all Democrat city politicians with conservative leadership murder rates would immediately plunge across the US by virtue of policy.

A very informative video on the subject..... how is it possible that we woke up in upside down land and now live in crazy world?

Engineered failure.

It looks pretty much inevitable that "they" are coming for the food. What better way to cure starvation than to produce less food? 

I think we all know where this is going. 

Revelation 6:6

Then I heard what sounded like a voice among the four living creatures, saying, 'Two pounds of wheat for a day's wages, and six pounds of barley for a day's wages, and do not damage the oil and the wine!'



Globalists revving up plans to engineer global famine and starvation: 13 nations agree to convert over to less-productive ‘green’ farming methods

https://leohohmann.com/2023/05/31/global...g-methods/

Quote:The global climate cult is getting ready to kick its war on food into overdrive with 13 nations – many of them major cattle and food-producing states led by the United States, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Spain – signing onto a commitment to place farmers under new restrictions intended to reduce emissions of methane gas.


The Global Methane Hub announced in a May 17 press release that agriculture and environmental ministers and ambassadors from 13 countries, including the United States, have signed a commitment that pledges to reduce methane emissions in agriculture. The U.S. was represented by Biden’s climate czar, John Kerry.

What does this mean and why should you care? We’ll break it down.

So it’s curious to me that, at the very time the globalists are warning about food shortages and famine, their mouthpieces at the World Bank, the U.N., and within the administrations of the U.S. and its allies (notice China and Russia are nowhere to be found in these preposterous anti-food policies), are talking about converting over to a new and unproven form of “sustainable” farming that’s focused more on reducing methane than it is on producing the highest yields of food.

Modern food production is bad, they tell us, because it produces methane which supposedly harms the environment.

“Food systems are responsible for 60% of methane emissions,” said Marcelo Mena, CEO of Global Methane Hub. “We congratulate countries willing to take the lead in food systems methane mitigation and confirm our commitment to support this type of initiative with programs that explore promising methane mitigation technologies and the underpinning research of methane mitigation mechanisms to create new technologies.”

John Kerry is also very excited about taking valuable, productive farmland offline, reducing the size of cattle herds, and turning our food-production systems over to technocrats and globalists offering vague promises of “new technologies.”
According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the U.S. is busy trying to mitigate methane emissions not just in America but worldwide, stating on its [b]website[/b]: “The United States provides key leadership, funding and technical expertise for international methane emission reduction efforts, resulting in more than 1,140 methane mitigation projects through GMI as of 2021.” 

How about some conspiracy predictions for the weekend 

For the upcoming "power grid event" that many believe is inevitable (because our grid is vulnerable and they refuse to fix it).

Will this one be the tipping point for their inevitable gun ban plan?


[b]When the lights go out, it’s becoming clear who will be blamed[/b]

https://www.blacklistednews.com/article/...power.html

Quote:That may sound like an overly simplistic statement, and yet look how many Americans marched in lockstep to the advice of the media over the last two-plus years when it came to taking a deadly toxic, spike-protein laced injection. I personally know many who wish they had not succumbed and taken those shots. Some will admit it openly. Others not so much. But you can see the distress in their eyes whenever the topic comes up.


The corporate media has become so corrupt and its messaging so indistinguishable from the government in Washington that they will literally say anything, read any script, write any fake story, that their mockingbird handlers order them to relay to the public. To do otherwise means instant termination and isolation. The pattern is now there for all to see. We have a plethora of national journalists who have either quit or been fired by their corporate-media bosses because they asked too many questions, or insisted on reporting on forbidden topics. Sharyl Attkisson, Lara Logan, Tucker Carlson, just to name a few. Others like Gary Webb and Michael Hastings died under mysterious circumstances.

So it is with great dread that I must alert you to the alerts coming out of the mainstream media over the weekend while many of us were enjoying family barbecues, going to the beach, or sitting on a fishing boat. The evil ones never rest. Not when they believe they are in their final end-game scenario of America’s long-awaited destruction. All of the major corporate media outlets, working in collusion with the federal government, put out an alert about the potential for [b]“right-wing” attacks[/b] on the U.S. power grid.

I don't like making post with little content but I am not really presenting anything that is new. 

We lived through this together. Looking back on it in mini shorts, shows just how cringeworthy all of it was and is. 

Link to the Highwire Conference if interested.

I have a three hour class every day for five days. I won't be able to catch it.

Unfortunately, I don't think anything will be revealed that I don't already know.

https://thehighwire.com/thegreatawakening/

I find this story interesting , because man who passed away long time talked about something we may now witness in our time here . No doubt Steiner was quite interesting and educated chap , thought i really dont know much about him ,never really looked him much.

Like this " squid-like beings, she says, attach themselves to unprotected people and harvest their spiritual energy by causing division and discord among us."  

Steiner & the Blood Demons

Quote:Jason Heppenstall, New Dawn
Waking Times
Is the human race under spiritual attack? And did the esoteric philosopher and clairvoyant Rudolf Steiner warn about it over a century ago when he said a ‘vaccine’ would be the delivery system for the defeat of humanity?
For many, the overly-authoritarian response by governments worldwide to COVID-19 pointed to some deeper, more sinister driving force. But it hasn’t just been the governments that seemed to be acting strange. Over the last two years, we’ve witnessed people across a broad spectrum of society meekly submit to draconian attacks on their freedoms, many even fiercely defending the assault. In the same way, we’ve seen politicians and parties who once ran on platforms of personal freedom and economic autonomy almost overnight turn into overbearing control freaks, intent on micromanaging every aspect of our lives. How has this happened?
Recently, the term ‘mass formation psychosis’ has been on everybody’s lips. It’s defined as a psychological phenomenon whereby a mass of people voluntarily go through a process of deindividuation, and a herd mentality forms. Due to their contagious nature, the thoughtforms affecting these deindividuated people, catalysed by the positive feedback loops of news programmes, social media and peer interaction, spread like wildfire throughout the population. In the past, this used to be called mob psychology, or more plainly, the madness of crowds.

Quote:Psychology: from Science to the Occult

Someone for whom the events of the past couple of years would not have been so surprising was the Austrian esoteric philosopher and mystic Rudolf Steiner, who died almost a century ago. Throughout his life, Steiner wrote numerous books and delivered thousands of lectures on his theories, contributing greatly to diverse spheres from architecture to education and agriculture to beekeeping. His highly unique – and sometimes controversial – insights and methods led to the founding of the spiritual movement known as Anthroposophy, which emphasises the existence of a boundless potential for human beings.
Unlike some esoteric thinkers, Steiner saw the great importance of materialistic science but argued that it was vital to see it as only a single aspect of reality which should ideally be combined with what he called ‘spiritual science’ – gained by mystical experience – in order to present the full picture. After all, breakthroughs often occur when scientists receive insights from beyond the material realm, as in the famous case of James Watson, credited with the discovery of the double helix shape of DNA which came to him in a dream featuring two intertwined serpents. Similarly, Dmitri Mendeleev created the periodic table after a dream of “… a table where all the elements fell into place as required.” These cases go to show that not all scientific discoveries are the result of logical deduction and experimentation.

In fact, Steiner, who had been on the receiving end of mystical insights since childhood, honed his clairvoyant skills to such an extent that the information he received from non-conventional sources became more than the occasional flash of insight. His quest became the establishment of methods for obtaining objective extrasensory perception – a task he considered of paramount importance, for he believed an epic battle was being fought in the spiritual realm that would have disastrous consequences for humankind unless it was addressed head-on.

Quote:Spirits of Darkness

His clearest warnings about the future fate of humanity came in a series of lectures delivered towards the end of his life in Dornach, Switzerland; these lectures are reproduced in the book The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness. Although Steiner’s detractors say his prose can be leaden, his lectures meandering, and his concepts difficult to grasp, he is remarkably clear and straightforward when it comes to the fate that awaits humanity if our obsession with scientific materialism is allowed to reign free without being pulled back into balance by the counterbalancing forces of spirituality.

This is most clearly illustrated in the final two lectures in the series – 13 and 14 – which are respectively titled The Fallen Spirits’ Influence in the World and Into the Future. Steiner posits that an unseen battle took place in the early 19th century which certain ‘spirits of darkness’ lost. These spirits were duly ejected from their heavenly realms and cast down into a more material plane of existence, i.e. here. He is remarkably precise about when this occurred: autumn 1879.

These newly arrived spirits joined those who were already here – the ones that have been existing alongside and influencing humanity since the mythological times associated with the Fall. Given that it takes time for these malign spirits to work their way through human societies, it wasn’t until 1914 that their malign influence manifested in human society in the form of the First World War – a disastrous event the cause of which still puzzles secular historians.

Quote:Lucifer and Ahriman – the Leaders of the Pack

The spirits Ahriman and Lucifer have been hacking humanity for thousands of years, says Steiner, with Lucifer being the ‘light bringer’ intent on making us more spiritual and granting us more free will, and Ahriman doing the opposite and making us more materialistic and easier to control. In simplistic terms, Lucifer is an ascending influence, while Ahriman is a descending one.

Why should they want to do this? Well, we just don’t know – it’s difficult for our human minds to figure out what makes angels and demons tick. But whenever there’s one of those periodic battles in the spirit world, Steiner said, it tends to result in a new batch of reinforcements being thrown down into the material realm to join forces with those already here.

Steiner told us that Ahriman – a demon first identified by the Zoroastrians in ancient Persia – has the upper hand right now. He had a personal beef with Ahriman and had seen his face in vision – in fact, he was still carving a likeness of it out of wood at the time of his death. Ahriman’s main aim seems to be to drag humankind into a purely materialistic state devoid of any form of spirituality, removing even the impulse to connect with our souls. The method of attack would be through science and technology, and by taking possession of the minds of powerful and influential people in order to push through this agenda. These controlled people could be scientists, politicians, religious leaders, or anyone with any influence. Thus, demonic forces would work through these people, and the people themselves, blinded by all-too-human failings such as greed or a lust for power, would lack the basic awareness to recognise what was occurring.

Quote:

Quote:A New Religion for a New Age

The background to this power grab was the rise of atheism and the worship of science and progress. Now, we have a situation in which a purely materialist perspective is presented as the only explanation for all creation. Atheism has become a de facto religion for some, while the rich traditions of native spirituality have been side-lined and crushed under its heel. People, animals and all life is regarded in the same cold manner; merely receptacles of proteins and genetic code that can be exploited. The endgame of this play is presented as a bleak, monochrome world expunged of spirit and light, where humans – their minds and spirits broken – are herded together and monitored like lab animals.

We can see how this scenario is being expedited. The CEOs of tech corporations are viewed almost as saints or Bodhisattvas, dangling the carrot of eternal life in the form of uploading the ‘data’ contained within our brains onto microchips. At the same time, politicians, corporate scientists, civil servants and economists are regarded as technocratic engineers tasked with ensuring the smooth functioning of the juggernaut of the material economy. Free will? The implicit assumption is that this will be unnecessary once the AI-powered algorithms – which know us better than we do – reach escape velocity. At this stage, human life would have no intrinsic value, and the shells of our former selves would be occupied by the demonic army that Steiner warned us was waiting for its moment.

Quote:In the Blood

Some people say that Rudolf Steiner predicted a vaccine would appear which would be the delivery system for the final defeat of humankind. In light of the clandestine efforts made over the last two years to inject almost everybody on the planet with a gene-editing treatment, his prescience seems remarkable – but how true is it?
Amazingly, Steiner was remarkably clear (by his own standards) about the physical process by which this takeover would occur. In his final lecture in The Fall of the Spirits of Darkness, he states that the spiritual world where entities such as angels, demons, and archangels dwell is within the human blood. He meant this quite literally, saying:

Quote:“Both the Archangels and the Angels had their dwelling place in the blood, as it were. Truly, the blood is not something merely for chemists to analyse; it is also the dwelling place of entities from higher worlds.”

To that end, he speculated that the delivery mechanism would be in the form of a vaccine injected directly into our bodies.

Quote:“Today [in 1917] bodies are vaccinated against one thing and another; in future, children will be vaccinated with a substance which it will certainly be possible to produce, and this will make them immune so that they do not develop foolish inclinations connected with spiritual life – ‘foolish’ here, of course, in the eyes of the materialists.”

This ‘vaccine’, he goes on to say, would block off any communication from the spirit world, meaning no messages or impulses would be able to get through from the ‘spirits of light’ whose aim is always to help humanity progress and fulfil our destiny. The vaccine would permanently lock out positive impulses which were once transmitted to us, and instead the hapless victims would only be able to receive the impulses coming to them from disruptive sources, which we can imagine today might include the media, the education system and even established religion. He says there would be great confusion, and Ahrimanic forces will turn people’s thoughts upside down and inside out. Everything that once was good and sensible will appear evil and crazy, while everything that was once considered insane and evil will be presented as sensible and good.

Quote:Squid Games: From Wetiko to The Matrix

Does this sound implausible, the ramblings of a long-dead mystic? Many will no doubt say that it does and that there are more earthly and plausible explanations for the psychic epidemic that has gripped the world. Perhaps Steiner was speaking metaphorically, after all, some may reason. Nevertheless, the phenomenon to which Steiner alluded bears striking similarities to the Native American concept of wetiko. The author Paul Levy has written extensively about this, defining it as “a contagious psychospiritual disease of the soul, a parasite of the mind that is currently being acted out en masse on the world stage via a collective psychosis of titanic proportions.”
Listening to a recent Legalise Freedom podcast entitled ‘COVID-19: War on Humanity’, Emma Farrell, a plant healer who uses shamanic techniques to access inner realms, observed that she and others in the same field had seen a veritable horde of spiritual parasitic entities attached to people over the last two years – as if a floodgate had been opened and they had poured through it. These entities, she says, come in all shapes and sizes, but there are two very common and recognisable ones, one of which is squid-like. These squid-like beings, she says, attach themselves to unprotected people and harvest their spiritual energy by causing division and discord among us.

Quote:

Quote:ABOVE:  Promotional graphic depicts the squid-like robot which appears in the 2003 film The Matrix Revolutions.   TOP:  Netflix’s hit series of 2021, Squid Game, is a grim and violent survival thriller that posits human nature as intrinsically barbaric.
This struck me as interesting as we’ve seen this squid archetype move into human consciousness over the past few years, not least becoming apparent through popular culture. Many people have reported having dreams of octopus or squid-like creatures, and artists such as Peter Yankowski have painted pictures of these visions. Indeed, the villainous machines that control humans and harvest their energies in the Matrix movies look like robotic squids, while one of the top Netflix series of 2021 was Squid Game, a grim and violent survival thriller that posits human nature as intrinsically barbaric. What’s more, the resurgence in popularity of H.P. Lovecraft’s supernatural tales of horrors from the deep adds another tentacled layer to this rugose cake.
And let’s not forget when Goldman Sachs, one of the world’s largest investment banks, was memorably described by Rolling Stone journalist Matt Taibbi as a “great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity, relentlessly jamming its blood funnel into anything that smells like money.” The description is apt; after all, what is the purpose of an investment bank other than to turn every aspect of the sacred world into a monetised asset that can be traded, exploited and leveraged?

Quote:

Quote:The Path Back to Sanity
Could this manifestation of a squid/octopus archetype into human consciousness be what Steiner warned us about? Are there really spiritual entities within our blood that could account for billionaire technocrats’ obsession with injecting substances into us that are said to contain nanoparticles we know very little about? And how does this sit with the psychospiritual disease of wetiko outlined by Paul Levy and the concept of ‘mass formation psychosis’ being discussed in alternative media?
Perhaps the truth lies somewhere in the nexus of these concepts, with the implicit suggestion that we should not rest in our deep enquiry into the manner of the affliction that is currently so prevalent across the world. Only by doing so can we hope to find the necessary tools and weapons for fighting back against it.
Or maybe the Ahrimanic demons that Steiner warned us about, the wetiko mind parasites Paul Levy writes of, and the tentacled entities that have squirmed into our collective consciousness via popular culture, are all playing on the same team. If so, what does our team look like? And how do we win this game? Perhaps the fight is a necessary one at this juncture in human development, and that by defeating these ‘spirits of darkness’ we can progress to a higher level.
Whatever the case, referring back to the old adage alluded to earlier… people, it’s said, might go mad in crowds, but the path back to sanity happens one person at a time.

https://lists.youmaker.com/links/17sdbJb...tZ6Oeq3TZt

Quote:The Bombshell Report That Could Change Our Water
A suppressed government report has become the battleground over the safety of fluoridating our water supply
FEATUREDAmerica the Fluoridated

Christy Prais
Jun 1 2023
biggersmaller

The National Toxicology Program's fluoride report has suffered delays unseen since the investigation into asbestos. (Photo courtesy of The International Academy of Oral Medicine & Toxicology)

0:0019:21






In this series, we explore the contentious findings surrounding fluoridation of the U.S. public water supply, and answer the question of whether water fluoridation poses a risk and what we should do about it.
Previously: An ongoing lawsuit brought against the EPA by the Fluoride Action Network has uncovered concerning admissions from both EPA and CDC officials.
To fluoridate or not to fluoridate? That is a question that may soon be weighed across the United States.
The future of U.S. community water fluoridation programs hinges largely on the National Toxicology Program’s (NTP’s) six-year systematic review, a report that takes a critical look at the available science but has become mired in government interference and controversy.
Draft releases of the report—revealed as part of an ongoing lawsuit—affirm the science that links fluoride to lower intelligence in children. The report’s findings support multiple studies concluding that fluoride is a neurodevelopmental toxin.
The “NTP Monograph on the State of the Science Concerning Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects: A Systematic Review,” as it’s officially called, has been beset with unprecedented delays in a contentious battle over statistics, verbiage, and final conclusions.
The report, or monograph, is significant because it assesses all research and studies regarding the neurotoxic effects of fluoridated water exposure and raises questions about long-term health effects.
A two-year delay in the release of this pivotal monograph has become a major element in an ongoing lawsuit brought against the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) by the Fluoride Action Network (FAN), which seeks to ban chemical fluoride additives from the U.S. public drinking water supply.
Between September 2019 and February 2022, the report went through five separate peer-review processes and three revised draft iterations that incorporated all suggestions and comments from all five peer-review processes.
Despite the extensive peer reviews and draft revisions, internal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) emails revealed government officials blocked the release of the May 2022 draft that was considered final by the NTP.
Court documents show that an undisclosed working group then started a review process to “adjudicate” undisclosed comments made by “agency subject matter experts.”
The May 2022 draft wasn’t made public until March 15 and was only released as a result of months of legal motions, subpoenas, extensive negotiations with the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ)—which is representing the EPA in court—and a court order.
The NTP’s Controversial Findings
The National Toxicology Program (NTP) is an interagency government program run by the Department of Health and Human Services to protect the American public from toxins. The NTP is under the department’s National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences.
The NTP started its fluoride toxicity review in 2015, according to minutes of a meeting of the program’s Board of Scientific Counselors in December 2015.
Dr. Kristina Thayer, director of the NTP Office of Health Assessment and Translation, told the board that the review would evaluate fluoride exposure and the potential for developmental neurobehavioral effects. She highlighted findings from the 2006 National Research Council report and a 2015 review done for Ireland’s Department of Health, which highlighted potential neurological effects.
The NTP’s review on fluoride looked at data from more than 500 studies on fluoride exposure and neurotoxicity that included more than 150 human studies as well as non-human mammal and vitro studies.
[/url] From NTP Sept 2022, Figure 2, Study Selection Diagram
Out of the studies reviewed, 29 of the human studies were rated high quality and the report included a meta-analysis of more than 50 studies on fluoride exposure and children’s IQ.
The meta-analysis in the most recent version of the NTP draft review concluded that “52 of 55 studies reported an inverse association between fluoride exposure and children’s IQ.”
In other words, the more fluoride children are exposed to, the lower their IQ. The estimated drop, based on a range of studies, is approximately seven IQ points.
Although a drop in seven IQ points may not seem like a big deal, it has detrimental effects on the population as a whole, explained Christine Till, a clinical neuropsychologist and adjunct scientist at the neuroscience and mental health program at Sick Kids Hospital in Toronto, in a May presentation. Till was involved in one of the most recent studies on fluoride as part of Health Canada’s Maternal-Infant Research on Environmental Chemicals research platform.
Till stressed that just a five-point decrease in a population’s IQ would increase the number of people classified as intellectually disabled to 9.5 million from 6 million and the number of people considered gifted would drop to 2.4 million from 6 million.
To understand the significance of that cost, it helps to consider the effects at scale. A May 2021 review published in the journal Children titled “Monetary Valuation of Children’s Cognitive Outcomes in Economic Evaluations from a Societal Perspective: A Review” estimated the “implied lifetime monetary valuation of an IQ point in the United States” to be between $10,600 and $13,100. In other words, if 100 million people lost five IQ points, it would amount to $5.3 trillion to $6.55 trillion in total lost income.
Another concerning finding in the review is that there is no obvious safe threshold for fluoride exposure.
Till stressed that data in the NTP report show that there is a drop in children’s IQ even between the lower ranges from zero to 2.0 mg/L of urinary fluoride levels. Measurement of fluoride levels in urine is a method used for the estimation of fluoride exposure levels.
From NTP Sept 2022, figure 17
“The potential for adverse health effects of early-life exposure to fluoride are of huge public health significance,” she said.
Dr. Jack Kall, executive chair of the Board of Directors of the International Academy of Oral Medicine and Toxicology, noted other concerning findings of the review in a recent interview on “Discovering True Health.”
“Human epidemiological evidence supports a conclusion of ‘moderate confidence’ that fluoride is a developmental neurotoxin,” Kall said.
Confidence ratings in the report range between one and four, with four being the highest confidence. Moderate confidence is three out of four.
Figure 1. Assessing Confidence in the Body of Evidence
Kall noted that a moderate ranking is where serious scientists start asking some very hard questions around safety, such as “If there is that level of confidence, shouldn’t we be implementing some changes around exposure to this [fluoride]”?
Kall also stressed that the review revealed people are exposed to enough fluoride to experience harm, according to the research.
“Fluoride exposures experienced by pregnant women and children in the U.S. today are within the range where human studies have found reduced IQ,” Kall said.
Unprecedented Delays, Lack of Transparency
What’s unique about the NTP—normally—is its track record of transparency. A large number of their most recent reports had a public peer-review process lasting a few days, and [url=https://fluoridealert.org/wp-content/uploads/Plainitffs-Opp-Brief_FILED.pdf]court documents note that drafts of NTP reports were always provided to the public.
According to court records, the government insisted the May 2022 draft of the report—which was the draft considered by the NTP as final—“should not be released to the public.” Emails obtained through the lawsuit, however, show that the American Dental Association, the nation’s largest lobbying group on pro-fluoride issues, had already been provided with a copy.
The association went on to urge the NTP to exclude any statements of neurotoxicity of fluoride from the report, saying such claims aren’t supported by scientific evidence.
According to an NTP press release, the CDC, FDA, and NIH experts expressed concerns that their previous comments on the meta-analysis weren’t adequately addressed, although the NTP authors disagreed with the agency experts’ comments and criticisms in many cases. Court documents allege that these particular comments may have been what the undisclosed working group was charged to adjudicate.
The names of the BSC working group  and agency comments were disclosed per court order and subpoena although agency names attached to the comments were redacted.
Subsequent to the release, plaintiffs’ attorneys reached an agreement with the EPA’s attorneys that they would provide them a “key” that would unlock the redacted sections and identify the agencies corresponding to comments and criticisms. 
The Epoch Times has obtained a copy of the redacted agency names which include:  Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR), National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD), Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health (OASH), National Institutes of Health/Office of the Director (NIH/OD)
Although actual employee names were not obtained, plaintiff attorney Michael Connett told The Epoch Times in an email that “the main criticisms came from the CDC and NIDCR.” Both agencies promote water fluoridation program in the U.S.
A Timeline of the NTP Fluoride Report
The timeline of events for the NTP report on fluoride is as follows:
2015: A meeting of the NTP’s board reveals a program is being developed to review the potential neurotoxicity of fluoride.
2016: The NTP publishes its first report on fluoride, titled “Systematic Literature Review on the Effects of Fluoride on Learning and Memory in Animal Studies.”
September 2019: The NTP publicly releases a draft of its second report on fluoride, titled “Systematic Review of Fluoride Exposure and Neurodevelopmental and Cognitive Health Effects.” The review looks at both animal and human studies, but focuses more on human studies. 
September 2019–March 2020: The second report draft is peer-reviewed by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM).
September 2020: The NTP incorporates NASEM’s suggestions from the peer review and released a revised report.
September 2020–February 2021: A second peer review is conducted by NASEM on the revised 2020 report. 
July 2021–July 2022: The report is reviewed by various Department of Health and Human Services entities.
November 2021: The NTP incorporates NASEM’s comments from the second-round peer process and completes another revised 2021 draft.
November 2021–February 2022: The 2021 draft undergoes a peer-review process by five external nongovernment scientists.
January 2022: The NTP states, “Pending general reviewer agreement with our document, we anticipate public availability of a revised final state of the science report by the end of March.” 
May 2022: The NTP incorporates all comments from all five external peer reviewers and completes a finalized copy of the report. It decides to publicly release the report on May 18, 2022.
June 2022: Government officials decide to put the report on “hold,” according to emails obtained via the Freedom of Information Act.
October 2022–May 2023: Another review is done by an undisclosed working group set by the NTP’s board to adjudicate 325 comments and criticisms on the report received from external peer reviewers and federal agency experts.
March 15, 2023: After months of legal motions, subpoenas, extensive negotiations, and a court order, the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences publicly releases the NTP’s final report that was intended to be published in May 2022. The final report include a September 2022 marked-up “working” draft with reviewers’ comments and NTP authors’ responses, with names redacted. 
The September 2022 NTP version was for the most part identical to the May 2022 version with very few, if any, meaningful changes although it does contain extensive comments from some of the agency reviewers along with NTP’s responses.
The Story of Asbestos
Kall noted that the last time major delays like this were witnessed in the process of an NTP review was with the now-highly regulated cancer-causing substance asbestos. However, “the delays have been much worse with the NTP report on fluoride,” he said.
Similarly to the chemical fluoride additive, asbestos is big business in the United States.
Despite the known health hazards documented as early as 1898, a 2023 asbestos global market report says the global asbestos market size grew from $950 million in 2022 to $1.01 billion in 2023 and is expected to grow to $1.53 billion in 2027.
More than 60 countries have banned asbestos, but the United States has only partially banned it. In 2020, the EPA found an unreasonable risk to human health and has proposed to ban it under the Toxic Substances Control Act but hasn’t yet done so.
The 2022 market size of fluorosilicic acid, which is the chemical fluoride additive most used in 75 percent of the U.S. public water supply, was $1.1 billion and expected to grow to $1.57 billion by 2023, per a Reports and Data press release.
Government Interference
Many doctors, scientists, and experts witnessing the prolonged process say the government has tried to quash and dilute the report for political purposes. The possibility that a major public health program had unintended side effects is no doubt a significant issue for those that supported it as mounting evidence of neurotoxicity came to light.
Internal CDC emails obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request by FAN’s attorney Michael Connett reveal how authorities responded to the unreleased May 2022 draft of the Fluoride Toxicity Report.
“We have set May 18, 2022, for publication of the monograph. The monograph will be posted to the NTP website, and we will email a notice of the posting to NTP listserv subscribers,” Mary Wolfe told CDC officials in a May 11, 2022, email. Wolfe is the deputy director for policy and communication at the Division of Translational Toxicology, which functions somewhat like a communications arm for the NTP.
Several back-and-forth emails ensued from CDC official Karen Hacker regarding clarification around whether the report publication had National Institutes of Health clearance and whether it also would be going through a Health and Human Services interagency review.
Later that same day, Wolfe clarified, “My reply noted that we believe the current findings, as stated in the monograph, reflect the scope of our evaluation and the available scientific literature, and no revision is needed.”
Hacker pushed back, wanting to set up a meeting as soon as possible “to discuss the rollout and messaging.”
Then something happened behind the scenes that wasn’t captured in the emails released.
A June 3, 2022, email from Nicole Johnson, associate director for policy, partnerships, and strategic communications at the CDC Division of Oral Health, stated, “The latest we heard (yesterday) is that ASH Levine [Assistant Secretary of Health Rachel Leland Levine] has put the report on hold until further notice.”
The May 2022 monograph draft on fluoride wasn’t released until March 15, after a subpoena and court order from Judge Edward M. Chen during the course of the current lawsuit against the EPA.
One Step Closer to Publication
After the forced release of the draft, two public meetings were held, one on May 4 and the other on May 16, where the NTP’s board of counselors voted unanimously to accept the recommendations of their working group and move forward with the completion process.
NTP Director Richard Woychik, who is also director of the National Institute for Environmental Health Sciences, is now ultimately responsible for deciding on the final publication. He said in his closing remarks that he will be working with the members of the working group and the NTP authors to make revisions and try to get the report to publication as quickly as possible, hopefully in the next several weeks.
Woychik mentioned that he would also be consulting with their partner organizations, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the CDC, in the finalization process.
Next: Keeping fluoride out of your drinking water will often depend on an effective home filtration system—but not all water filters are created equal. 
Read Part 1 – The Renewed Scientific Opposition to Water Fluoridation
Read Part 2 – Uncovering the Differences: Why Natural Fluoride and Synthetic Fluoride Are Not Created Equal
Read Part 3 – Fluoride: A Miracle Cure for Cavities, a Poison, or Both
Read Part 4 – Health Effects of Fluoride: The Science
Read Part 5 – New Studies Link Fluoride to Reduced IQ and ADHD in Children
Read Part 6 – Hidden Fluoride in Our Food, Medicine, and Environment
Read Part 7 – Arsenic: A Known Contaminant in Fluoride Added to the US Water Supply
Read Part 8 – Fluoride Lawsuit Against EPA: Alleged Corruption, Shocking Under Oath Federal Statements

another short story at ATS

Quote:It is strange the thoughts that were running through my mind as the sands of time ran thru the imaginary hour glass sat before me.

Tommy had been one of my best friends and along with Don we flew a three ship Acrobatic routine at some of our local airshows; nothing astounding but we had fun and our hotel and gas was payed for where ever we went so it was worth it for three guys who loved to fly.

We were gathered by our aircraft before our latest show when Tommy with a majestic wave of his hand said, “ As I stood upon the burning sand I did spy a camel caravan; under a sky ever so blue you could see their destination was Timbuktu.”

Not to be outdone Don thought for a moment and then said, “ Tim and me a hunting we had WENT, where we saw three maidens all in a TENT. Now, they be three and we be two so I bucked one and Tim bucked two.”

I was speechless and had to fight the tears back from laughing so hard.

Even today I smiled as I thought of my long dead friends and the good times we had shared over the years. I guess as long as you remember someone they are never truly dead ?

I could tell the hourglass sand was almost gone from the top cylinder as I laid upon the floor; at least the chest pain had stopped. I saw a bright light and in that light stood Tommy and Don with outstretched hands beckoning me to come to them.

The End.