![]() |
Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Printable Version +- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb) +-- Forum: Mother Earth (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=85) +--- Forum: Man Made Disasters (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=88) +--- Thread: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious (/showthread.php?tid=3018) |
Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Michigan Swamp Buck - 08-30-2025 I want some of the radioactive shrimp I can get at my local grocery store, the shrimp from Indonesia. You know, the seafood with Cesium-137 isotopes they have been pumping out of Fukushima for almost 15 years now. The same stuff they claim has a naturally occurring amount in seawater, even though it is entirely unnatural and can only come from fission power plants. It is our signature in nature now, we have "tagged" the entire world with unnatural radioactive isotopes. Maybe radioactive shrimp can be a healthy addition to our diet. I remember a couple of years after Fukushima, there was a politician who said that a little radiation is good for you. The models they had back then showed the radiation would spread over the entire Pacific in 5 years. Now add ten more years and see what areas are unaffected in the largest ocean on planet Earth. They never stopped pumping the seawater on those hot coals burning away in the basement. Makes me wonder when the core will drop down enough to cover it with dirt and forget about it. Well, maybe you could know the level of contamination and the areas it is concentrating in and what sea food is glowing, but the information is hard to find, in fact it is nearly non-existent. I'm seriously surprised they admitted "there could be" some radioactive sea food and recalled it. I'd like to see some readings of this shrimp and see if it is contaminated and if so, how much. RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - SomeJackleg - 08-30-2025 (08-30-2025, 12:40 PM)Michigan Swamp Buck Wrote: I want some of the radioactive shrimp I can get at my local grocery store, the shrimp from Indonesia. You know, the seafood with Cesium-137 isotopes they have been pumping out of Fukushima for almost 15 years now. The same stuff they claim has a naturally occurring amount in seawater, even though it is entirely unnatural and can only come from fission power plants. It is our signature in nature now, we have "tagged" the entire world with unnatural radioactive isotopes. i read and heard on the news the first batch came out of contamanated shipping containers. Quote:After being alerted to the contamination of shipping containers detected by CBP, the FDA initiated sampling of products which included five different shrimp products from PT. Bahari Makmur Sejati, one of which was a sample of frozen breaded shrimp. FDA’s laboratory confirmation of Cs-137 in the breaded shrimp had detectable levels of Cs-137 present at 68.48 Bq/kg +/- 8.25 Bq/kg. There was no detectable Cs-137 in the other products tested; however, this does not rule out contamination. now my question is, were they shipped in COSCO containers or any of the 12 other mega chinese shipping companies. remember the chinese gave us covid which no matter what they say wasn't a natural occurence. RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Michigan Swamp Buck - 08-30-2025 I remember the shipping containers, too. At the time, I thought it was unlikely to contaminate packaged food products and might be a lead-in to some cover-up story. Food can be irradiated, but you wouldn't find the Cs-137; maybe read some radiation before it dissipated, but nothing in the shrimp. Then again, if the container is contaminated, then the docks are, pallets are, forklifts are, warehouses are, refrigerated trucks are, workers and drivers, and on and on . . . RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Kenzo1 - 08-30-2025 I curious how can radiactive material in general get green light from US port , leaving the port area and get then transported to destined locations in US ? Is this so called " low level radiation " with that shrimp shipping containers that homeland security etc wont stop it leaving port area ? RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Michigan Swamp Buck - 08-31-2025 Here is from 2016 . . . Quote:. . . ![]() Link RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Michigan Swamp Buck - 09-01-2025 The search engines keep repeating the results from old FDA and NOAA studies, along with other old scientific studies. However, I noticed that there was a concern for tribal fishing along the Canadian coast, but no current Canadian government data I could find easily. Then I got some detailed information from the State of Alaska in the form of a list. The website has the list and a link to a PDF file. Quote:Great State of Alaska https://dec.alaska.gov/eh/vet/fish-monitoring-program/radioisotopes-in-fish-caught-in-alaskan-waters I noticed how the FDA can't detect anything in 2025 and to make a correction here, they had "not detected" for many tests with the rest as "not applicable" for this whole study. This doesn't seem like good data to me. RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - GeauxHomeLittleD - 09-01-2025 Could be a Cajun Conspiracy plot to make a radioactive seafood gumbo dirty bomb! RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Michigan Swamp Buck - 09-04-2025 Back in 1986 when the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant blew up and created a radioactive air mass with fallout, I began to take iodine supplements that were from the most common source, kelp from the oceans. Now, after Fukushima, I don't take that anymore due to contamination. They should be testing kelp for radioactive iodine that causes thyroid cancer. RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - 727Sky - 09-05-2025 nuke waste water from Japan https://www.mulhervestidadesol.com.br/z1img/22_04_2017__00_39_43597060804fd2613b4aac85851918532056ee4_480x480.jpg RE: Radioactive Shrimp - No one mentioned the obvious - Michigan Swamp Buck - 09-07-2025 I really didn't have to check out my "theory" about iodine 131 being found in kelp from the Pacific Ocean, but I did, and once again, "I told me so". This one from the NOAA talks about a kelp monitoring program in California back in 2014, and the link to the study is gone, a pattern I've been noticing with official websites on this subject. https://seagrant.noaa.gov/help-from-kelp/ Here is a more reasonable quote from the spring of 2012, one year after the disaster. Quote:Scientists from California State University, Long Beach tested giant kelp collected in the ocean off Orange County and other locations after the March, 2011 accident, and detected radioactive iodine, which was released from the damaged nuclear reactor. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/radioactive-iodine-from-from-fukushima-found-in-california-kelp/ But no worries, in about a month, the radioactive iodine will disappear like magic! Except you have to acknowledge that the output of contaminants has continued daily and increased for almost the past 15 years. So after eight days, only half of the radioactive iodine of a single day's output from Fukushima disappears. I'm not doing the math here, but it seems there will be a constant amount that accumulates exponentially. |