Time as three dimensions

[F2d5thCav]

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dim...ffect.html

Interesting concept.  I found the editor's note at the end to be schoolmarm-ish 

[Kenzo1]

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dim...ffect.html

Interesting concept.  I found the editor's note at the end to be schoolmarm-ish 

Yeeh interesting  

Is this anyway related to " mandela effect "  ?

[F2d5thCav]

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dim...ffect.html

Interesting concept.  I found the editor's note at the end to be schoolmarm-ish 

Yeeh interesting  

Is this anyway related to " mandela effect "  ?

Sounds like it, doesn't it ?  That bit about the dimension at right angles to the human perceived "arrow of time", which allows for similar but somewhat different timelines.  Have many of us already took a journey at those right angles ? 

[Kenzo1]

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dim...ffect.html

Interesting concept.  I found the editor's note at the end to be schoolmarm-ish 

Yeeh interesting  

Is this anyway related to " mandela effect "  ?

Sounds like it, doesn't it ?  That bit about the dimension at right angles to the human perceived "arrow of time", which allows for similar but somewhat different timelines.  Have many of us already took a journey at those right angles ? 

Could be , this is uncharted territory. The different timelines are bit funny , neither being wrong or right really ?  Someone says remembering a word ....others may not . Maybe there is no right or wrong fact in some peculiar circumstances where the perceivers are on 2 different channel simultaneously    . 

[F2d5thCav]

https://phys.org/news/2025-06-theory-dim...ffect.html

Interesting concept.  I found the editor's note at the end to be schoolmarm-ish 

Yeeh interesting  

Is this anyway related to " mandela effect "  ?

Sounds like it, doesn't it ?  That bit about the dimension at right angles to the human perceived "arrow of time", which allows for similar but somewhat different timelines.  Have many of us already took a journey at those right angles ? 

Could be , this is uncharted territory. The different timelines are bit funny , neither being wrong or right really ?  Someone says remembering a word ....others may not . Maybe there is no right or wrong fact in some peculiar circumstances where the perceivers are on 2 different channel simultaneously    . 

It sounds like a band of frequencies.  If you tune exactly on the signal, there is no interference.  If your tuner is off a bit, you may hear noise or bleed-over from other frequencies.

I want to find the frequency in which all the dumba**es didn't make it to positions of power 

"What's the frequency, Kenneth ?!" 

[F2d5thCav]

BTW, on that "what's the frequency" incident with Dan Rather, I didn't realize the attacker was eventually identified:

"

Belatedly, the Riddle of an Attack on Rather Is Solved
By FRANK BRUNI
Published: January 30, 1997

Over the course of a decade, it evolved from an incomprehensible utterance during a quizzical crime to the possible measure of a news anchor's unraveling to a kernel of kitschy folklore, memorialized as the title of a popular hit by the rock band R.E.M.

''Kenneth, what is the frequency?'' became more than just the question that Dan Rather, the CBS news anchor, said he was asked during an attack in 1986 that some detractors unfairly dismissed as apocryphal. It became a nonsensical oddity and an unsolved mystery: Who said it, and why, and what ever happened to him?

Now, it seems, there may be some answers, as The Daily News first reported on Wednesday. According to Mr. Rather and law enforcement officials, the man who punched and kicked him appears to be the same man who, in 1994, fatally shot an NBC stagehand outside Rockefeller Center.

And in both cases, the motive was distrust and suspicion of the news media, said Dr. Park Dietz, a forensic psychiatrist who examined the man, William Tager, after the shooting of the stagehand, Campbell Theron Montgomery, 33. Dr. Dietz said in a telephone interview yesterday that Mr. Tager, serving a 121/2 - to 25-year sentence for manslaughter, believed that messages were being broadcast directly to him on the evening news.

Mr. Tager's lawyer, John Esposito, did not return a phone call to his office last night, but has said he is not convinced his client attacked Mr. Rather.

When Mr. Tager was arrested for the fatal shooting, he claimed responsibility for the attack against Mr. Rather as well, but the authorities did not investigate it, because the five-year statute of limitations had expired. But Dr. Dietz wanted to determine if Mr. Tager was lying about the attack against Mr. Rather on the Upper East Side. So, last year, he contacted Mr. Rather to see if Mr. Rather's memories of the crime matched Mr. Tager's.

Dr. Dietz said there were certain details about the building in which part of the attack occurred that both Mr. Rather and Mr. Tager recalled identically. On Tuesday, Mr. Rather looked at photographs of Mr. Tager provided to him by The Daily News and identified Mr. Tager as his attacker.

After the attack in 1986, Mr. Rather's critics lumped the incident together with a subsequent episode in which Mr. Rather stomped off the set, leaving the network with dead air time, as signs that he was losing his cool.

But as time passed, Mr. Rather came to make light of the incident himself, even singing along with R.E.M. during a performance of their song ''What's the Frequency, Kenneth?'' on David Letterman's show two years ago.

"

[Ninurta]

It's a cute theory, as far as it goes, but I don't believe it goes far enough. For example, it doesn't explore the phase angles of vectors predicated upon those 3 basic dimensions. Also, I think they need to find a different "third dimension of time" - simply being able to move along an already determined dimension does not seem to be a dimension in and of itself.

As we will all find out one day, "time" is a vastly complicated entity. far more complex than even this theory accounts for. It is so complex that it can fairly be said that "time does not exist" - at least not in the linear, unidirectional way that humans can perceive it.

Giving it 3 dimensions purely as a visualization tool is a step in the right direction, but accounting for the phase angles of vectors (or, more properly, the deltas or differences of those phase angles) predicated upon those dimensions would take us farther still. It could, conceivably, lead to something that may be viewed from a human perspective as "manipulation of time".

"Manipulation of time" would allow for some staggering things. Space travel, for example. If one can manipulate time, universal speed limits no longer have meaning, since speed is distance traveled over time.

Even in that case, however, we would still not have a firm grasp on the nature of time. Part of the problem is wrapped up in our conception of "mass" and "matter". Like time, neither of those truly exist in the ways we perceive them. At it's most basic, the entire universe consists only of energies and forces. When those gather into a discrete bundle, we see them as "mass" and "matter", but in reality they are not - they're just gatherings of energies and forces. That is all particles really are, and everything else is constructed from those particles.

At least that's how I see it, and how I'm going to continue to see it until something better comes along.

.

[Kenzo1]

How`s this ?


[img][/img]

[img][/img]

---