The thing is, regardless the security and domestic services that a Royal family enjoys, the basic communications
within the nucleus of any household will have at some point shown some evidence of similar or the same practices
that Andrew Windsor enjoyed.
So how would the security of the late-Queen's son be set up in a foreign land and with easy access that Epstein
demonstrated in the pictures from the exclusive Daily Mail article? Epstein merely leaves his Manhattan home
without any vigilance and there seems to be no sign of protection for him or his guests.
Who vets the young females that enter Epstein's home...? The US security system or/and the British security
services? Could these ladies have connections to countries that could benefit from acquiring particular information
from the former-Prince during these 'get-togethers'? It can be only guessed that due to the lax security behavior to
allow Andy's visits, such concerns are invalid or no checks were made.
Would a Prince that would be worth tremendous leverage if kidnapped, open and close a door on a busy street,
unless certain criteria were stood down? With an in-house security decorum necessary for visitors of political and
financial value to countries overseas and the accompanying security of high-societal people and those of noble
birth, this means a larger group could possibly become aware of such seemingly clandestine activities.
In the linked Daily Mail article above, it does state:
"...The footage begins just before 2.30pm on December 6, 2010, as two security men leave Epstein's
mansion and chat to another security man in a waiting Chrysler. Epstein's black Bentley arrives in the
street about 20 minutes later, shortly before a delivery man from Le Gourmet delivers a parcel..."
Would this imply confidence in the tight monitoring inside and out of the 40-room building from the security
staff mentioned or an assumption that any threat could only arrive from the street? Ergo, a lot of people
would have to willingly keep silent about Andy's frequent visits to Epstein's homes in New York and Florida.
This doesn't mean Andrew committed a sex-crime every time he travelled to the USA, but the reason for such
visits would have to fall within a rational basis for a second-rate aristocrat travelling abroad. All of this is also
under the assumption that dignitaries of all walks of life don't actually behave within safety parameters that we
believe and they live a lifestyle not too-far from our own.
Maybe what they've told us all of our lives isn't truly accurate.
within the nucleus of any household will have at some point shown some evidence of similar or the same practices
that Andrew Windsor enjoyed.
So how would the security of the late-Queen's son be set up in a foreign land and with easy access that Epstein
demonstrated in the pictures from the exclusive Daily Mail article? Epstein merely leaves his Manhattan home
without any vigilance and there seems to be no sign of protection for him or his guests.
Who vets the young females that enter Epstein's home...? The US security system or/and the British security
services? Could these ladies have connections to countries that could benefit from acquiring particular information
from the former-Prince during these 'get-togethers'? It can be only guessed that due to the lax security behavior to
allow Andy's visits, such concerns are invalid or no checks were made.
Would a Prince that would be worth tremendous leverage if kidnapped, open and close a door on a busy street,
unless certain criteria were stood down? With an in-house security decorum necessary for visitors of political and
financial value to countries overseas and the accompanying security of high-societal people and those of noble
birth, this means a larger group could possibly become aware of such seemingly clandestine activities.
In the linked Daily Mail article above, it does state:
"...The footage begins just before 2.30pm on December 6, 2010, as two security men leave Epstein's
mansion and chat to another security man in a waiting Chrysler. Epstein's black Bentley arrives in the
street about 20 minutes later, shortly before a delivery man from Le Gourmet delivers a parcel..."
Would this imply confidence in the tight monitoring inside and out of the 40-room building from the security
staff mentioned or an assumption that any threat could only arrive from the street? Ergo, a lot of people
would have to willingly keep silent about Andy's frequent visits to Epstein's homes in New York and Florida.
This doesn't mean Andrew committed a sex-crime every time he travelled to the USA, but the reason for such
visits would have to fall within a rational basis for a second-rate aristocrat travelling abroad. All of this is also
under the assumption that dignitaries of all walks of life don't actually behave within safety parameters that we
believe and they live a lifestyle not too-far from our own.
Maybe what they've told us all of our lives isn't truly accurate.
It's only an island if you look at it from the water.