(03-13-2026, 01:53 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:48 AM)The Crying Bunny Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:31 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:29 AM)The Crying Bunny Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:27 AM)quintessentone Wrote: The majority of Americans are against this war .

Then the majority of Americans are leftist pussy-cowards who don't have the ability to think.

Quite the contrary.

If the majority of Americans were for the war, then would your opinion change, or would you think independently?

It's not just what Americans think, it's what the world thinks. Many other countries don't want to join or aid the USA and Israel in this illegal war.

Scuttlebutt: Trump and Iran are reported to be interested in resuming negotiations but no scheduled day or time is yet reported.

(03-13-2026, 02:00 AM)The Crying Bunny Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:53 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:48 AM)The Crying Bunny Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:31 AM)quintessentone Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 01:29 AM)The Crying Bunny Wrote: Then the majority of Americans are leftist pussy-cowards who don't have the ability to think.

Quite the contrary.

If the majority of Americans were for the war, then would your opinion change, or would you think independently?

It's not just what Americans think, it's what the world thinks. Many other countries don't want to join or aid the USA and Israel in this illegal war.

Scuttlebutt: Trump and Iran are reported to be interested in resuming negotiations but no scheduled day or time is yet reported.

Jesus

You can't answer a question can you!

It puts your signature to shame.

Quote:“The third part of my address is a sincere expression of gratitude to our brave fighters. I sincerely thank our courageous fighters at a time when our beloved homeland is being unjustly attacked by the leading countries of the Front of Arrogance.

“The Iranian fighters, with their crushing blows, have blocked the enemy’s path and dispelled their illusion of them being able to dominate or possibly disintegrate our beloved homeland.

“My dear brothers in arms! What the Iranian people want is the continuation of an effective defence that makes the enemy regret.

“Furthermore, the leverage of closing the Strait of Hormuz must definitely continue to be utilised.

“The crime deliberately committed by the enemy against the Shajara Tayyibah School in Minab and other similar cases will receive particular attention in this process of taking revenge.

Full text of Iran’s new Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei’s first address

(03-13-2026, 12:47 AM)quintessentone Wrote: It's not my narrative, it's the reality of what's going on..................Have a nice day sheeple.

(03-13-2026, 05:10 AM)nerb Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 12:47 AM)quintessentone Wrote: It's not my narrative, it's the reality of what's going on..................Have a nice day sheeple.

Is that a personal "reality" formed from your stuff or the "common" one we all share formed from your stuff?

Asking for a sheeple friend.

(03-12-2026, 08:18 PM)Ninurta Wrote:

(03-12-2026, 07:07 PM)Kenzo1 Wrote: The problem is zionist in israel are heretical indoctrinated fake ideology that are suicidal ,acting like being is killing spree is normal state ....it is not.

Israel attacks central Beirut in escalation of deadly assault on Lebanon

They are out of their freaking minds , a danger to themselves , and also everyone else . They can be jews in other countries, America etc...Israelis can practice judaism many places.

They created monster , it`s just escalation after escalation with no end .

Ideally they would live in the current Israel yes and live happy life. But they turned to zionism and it`s not then all compatible with all other people in the ME and creates chronic problems that start also accumulate .

It`s not just Judaism ....they twisted it and use it`s name to justify all doings.

We are now near WW3 because the not compatible ideology . They need to start  looking mirror and  acting mature.

Everyone there need to start  looking mirror and  acting mature, hamas , Iran ...

So... because Jews can be Jewish anywhere, they don't deserve a place to call home, that they can't be kicked out of? Is that the logic we're working with here, or am I missing something?

Using that logic, Americans can be Americans anywhere... so should we just dissolve the nation here, maybe give it to the Mexicans because the US has treated the cartels so poorly?

There is a sizeable knot of Germans in Brazil and Argentina. They don't need Germany to be Germans, so can we just give Germany to the Russians or Poland then?

The French don't really need France - they can be French anywhere. We could give France to the Russians, too.

Somalis don't need Somalia to be Somalian - we could just move all of them to Minneapolis, where they can continue being Somalian on someone else's dime, and give Somalia to Egypt.

Finns don't need Finland to be Finnish. There's already a lot of them in Minnesota and Wisconsin. So can we just move the rest of them there, and give Finland to the Russians too? That's the logic I'm hearing here.

I would add in that Moslems can be Moslem anywhere, so we could just move them all to the UK and make the UK a Moslem nation, and dissolve the Middle East, but that's a little to uncomfortably close to what is actually happening.

Regarding the Israeli "escalations", why do we suppose they are "escalating"? In the example given, did they "escalate" just because it was a Thursday, and that's what you do on Thursdays - bomb Beirut? Even al-Jazeera, an Arab mouthpiece, acknowledged the reason for the "escalation" in that very article - it was because Hezbollah rocket attacked Israel first, on 2 March. Al-Jazeera - again, an Arab mouthpiece, so not exactly unbiased - CHOSE to call it an "escalation". Others might refer to it as a retaliation, or possibly a preventive measure. "Escalation" was the choice of wording for al-Jazeera, because it's pre-loaded with negative ramifications on Israel. Other folks might see it in a slightly more balanced manner, and call it something else.

Regarding the nukes, we've already been over that, so I won't rehash it all again here. You're afraid of them, I'm not, and neither of those viewpoints is likely to change. I also realize the vanishingly slim potential for them to be used in this conflict... assuming we do not allow Iran to get their hands on them. If that happens, all bets are off, but as for the currently (already) nuclearly armed nations, they have exercised remarkable restraint in their use for over 80 years now, and I don't see that changing any time soon. We have, in the past 80 years of nuclear armaments, been much, MUCH closer to a nuclear exchange than this, yet it has not happened. So color me skeptical on the threat of nuclear annihilation over Iran. It's just not a necessary measure to revoke the Iranian Cleric's birth certificates, so why would anyone risk it in the real world?

.

Quote:Here are the three ground Force options for Iran ... they all require forces that are not in theater. The USMC Amphibious Forces are in the Philippines and Puerto Rico. Thats right, we started a war in the Middle East without a land element. The ground seizure options are catastrophic. We cannot seize the Strait of Hormuz or the islands on the Iranian side without Marines. Also, you'd be sitting under their guns. We gamed this out in 1988 in a time of conflict. Read about it here

Quote:Mossad Commentary
@MOSSADil
·
4h
? Reports claim an Iranian ballistic missile was aimed toward NATO’s Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, a facility believed to store U.S. B61 nuclear bombs.

However, Turkish officials say the base was not hit, and NATO air defenses have intercepted missiles fired toward Turkish airspace in recent days.

Stay connected, follow
@MOSSADil
.

Quote:Balthazar
@Prof_Baltazar_
·
22h
Translated from Persian
In the coming days, America will issue a 48- or 72-hour ultimatum to the regime's forces: either surrender or head to Mashhad and stay safe there, or else they will be killed. This will place immense psychological pressure on these forces because they know that most of the commanders and government officials have already gone to Mashhad, as it hasn't been bombed or has been bombed very little. Of course, this was cleverly planned from the start by America and Israel.

The second point of psychological pressure after this ultimatum will be that the Basij and IRGC know their forces are disintegrating, and if they stand their ground, they'll be torn apart by the people—especially with air support from America and Israel.

Most families of Basij and IRGC members will head to Mashhad, along with many of them themselves.

Keeping Mashhad as an escape route is a key element in this war strategy, serving as a safety valve to provide an exit path for the repressive forces. Otherwise, these forces would be forced to fight to the end, even just for their own survival. But if they know they can go to Mashhad—which is a holy city for them—they'll psychologically convince themselves much faster and more easily to carry out this retreat.

After the ultimatum expires, Trump will tell the people of the cities—except Mashhad—to come out and, with air support from the U.S. and Israeli militaries, seize government organizations. Any remaining regime forces in the cities will be quickly killed or flee, and in less than 24 hours, the regime will collapse—except in the Mashhad region. The regime's forces, with their trademark audacity, will declare that they've conducted a strategic retreat to be alongside their Eighth Imam and regroup.

America and Israel will announce the end of military operations and keep a small number of their forces in a few centers to ensure security and form a transitional government. The task of retaking Mashhad after a short period will be handed over to Iran's new national army, which will attack Mashhad, clear out the remaining former regime forces, and likely send a group of them fleeing to Afghanistan.

And this will be the end of 47 years of the shameful, terrorist Islamic regime—a lesson for future generations that no Islamic force should ever be allowed entry into the realm of governance and politics, forevermore.
Quote
اسرائیل به فارسی

@IsraelPersian
·
Mar 11
Translated from Persian
There is no longer an Ayatollah, and we know that you do not want him to be replaced by another tyrannical Ayatollah.

In the coming days, we will provide you with the conditions to take your destiny into your own hands. 

(03-13-2026, 06:29 AM)putnam6 Wrote:

Quote:Mossad Commentary
@MOSSADil
·
4h
? Reports claim an Iranian ballistic missile was aimed toward NATO’s Incirlik Air Base in Turkey, a facility believed to store U.S. B61 nuclear bombs.

However, Turkish officials say the base was not hit, and NATO air defenses have intercepted missiles fired toward Turkish airspace in recent days.

Stay connected, follow
@MOSSADil
.

I have been wondering when they's target Turkey.
Not sure that's a good move on the IRGC's part.
Rainbows
Jane

(03-13-2026, 12:24 AM)quintessentone Wrote: The same can be said for USA/Israel's illegal war, which may be the reason triggering these shootings, 

(03-13-2026, 10:00 AM)YesItsMe Wrote: Report from Clemson that says Iran is spreading anti-Israel propaganda across dozens of social media sites.

They create accounts and are fake being Americans, Canadians, etc then talk smack about Israel.

Specifically called out is X, Instagram and Blue Sky.

The indoctrinated idiots at BlueSky will eat this crap up and love it.

https://www.foxnews.com/media/iranian-regime-spreading-anti-israel-propaganda-across-dozens-social-media-accounts-report

I'd post a quote from this but I've never done that before here and when I tried I couldn't figure it out.



A new 

(03-13-2026, 11:18 AM)YesItsMe Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 12:24 AM)quintessentone Wrote: The same can be said for USA/Israel's illegal war, which may be the reason triggering these shootings, 

Weak.  You are trying to make excuses for Muslims in this country who can't control their actions or emotions when they see something on TV that they disagree with.   There is no good reason for their murderous rampages.  They are uncivilized.   A civilized person will see something they disagree with politically and then peacefully try to change it, not go out and mass murder innocent people.   NO EXCUSES for what these Muslims did.  NONE.

(03-13-2026, 11:48 AM)quintessentone Wrote: I don't believe anything that comes out of your government 

(03-13-2026, 12:17 PM)YesItsMe Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 11:48 AM)quintessentone Wrote: I don't believe anything that comes out of your government 

But you believe Iran and anyone who says anything anti-American.
Which is funny.

The incidents in the past few days - the two attackers in NYC, the Michigan Synagogue, and the attack at Old Dominion, and the attack in Austin TX where the guy wore the 'property of allah' sweatshirt, were all done by Muslims.   You are trying to push the blame for that onto America and Israel, who engaged in a war of self defense, instead of on the Muslim attackers themselves for not controlling their own emotions when they hear something in the news that they don't like.  There is NO EXCUSE for them trying to mass murder innocent people.   NONE.

(03-13-2026, 11:45 AM)Ninurta Wrote: Another thing - I've heard now on several platforms, including this one, references to this "war" with the modifier of "illegal" attached to it, as in "illegal war". Can someone please tell me what they think makes this action "illegal"? Under whose law? What is the statute that makes it "illegal"?

(03-13-2026, 12:21 PM)quintessentone Wrote: In their minds they have a reason. 

Quote:Could it be the US teaming up with a homicidal maniac who targets civilians?

(03-13-2026, 12:22 PM)YesItsMe Wrote:

(03-13-2026, 11:45 AM)Ninurta Wrote: Another thing - I've heard now on several platforms, including this one, references to this "war" with the modifier of "illegal" attached to it, as in "illegal war". Can someone please tell me what they think makes this action "illegal"? Under whose law? What is the statute that makes it "illegal"?

Yeah, that always makes me laugh.  It's on different discussion forums and on left wing 'news' (propaganda) sites.   It's a marker that advertises the person is politically left wing and anti-American.   They can't actually speak to what makes it 'illegal', since the world isn't run by a single legal system.   It's their buzz word that they probably picked up in left wing BlueSky from other indoctrinated people there.

---

(03-13-2026, 12:21 PM)quintessentone Wrote: In their minds they have a reason. 

Their minds are warped and they have no reason.   They are whacked out murderers.   Plain and simple.

Quote:Could it be the US teaming up with a homicidal maniac who targets civilians?

I'm sure you are trying to claim that's Netanyahu.   Except you are wrong.   Israel purposely avoids targeting civilians.   They have proven this.   And it would make for bad warfare to do so, so your statement makes no sense militarily.

• Iran did not attack the U.S. or Israel before the strikes.
  
• No imminent threat was proven; in fact, direct negotiations were ongoing with Iran and Oman as a mediator hours before the attack. 
  
• The U.S. and Israel have not sought or received UN Security Council authorization.
  
• The doctrine of anticipatory self-defense does not justify the strikes, as the threat was not "instant, overwhelming, and leaving no choice of means" (Caroline doctrine). 
  
  

• The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war (Article I, Section 8). 
  
• The War Powers Resolution of 1973 requires presidential authorization from Congress for military action beyond 60 days unless there is a formal declaration of war or an emergency. 
  
• No such authorization was obtained. The Trump administration’s claims of an "imminent threat" were contradicted by Pentagon briefings and diplomatic developments. 
  
  

(03-13-2026, 12:28 PM)quintessentone Wrote:

• Iran did not attack the U.S. or Israel before the strikes.
  
• No imminent threat was proven; 
  
  

Under U.S. domestic law, the war is unconstitutional:

• The Constitution grants Congress the sole power to declare war (Article I, Section 8). 
  
• The War Powers Resolution of 1973 requires presidential authorization from Congress for military action beyond 60 days unless there is a formal declaration of war or an emergency.