+- Rogue-Nation Discussion Board (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb)
+-- Forum: History and Old Mystery (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=109)
+--- Forum: Lost and Ancient (https://rogue-nation.com/mybb/forumdisplay.php?fid=113)
+--- Thread: Massive underground structure discovered beneath the pyramids of Giza (/showthread.php?tid=2661)
Massive underground structure discovered beneath the pyramids of Giza - FlickerOfLight - 03-25-2025
The article provided discusses a discovery by archaeologists using advanced radar technology that suggests there may be a vast underground city beneath the Giza Pyramids. This subterranean structure is purported to stretch over 2,100 feet beneath the pyramids, with cylindrical formations and additional structures deeper underground. While some researchers have expressed skepticism regarding the feasibility of such a discovery, it has sparked intrigue in both archaeological and conspiracy circles.
This actually does align with certain conspiracy theories, particularly those suggesting that the pyramids were not just tombs but have far more profound, hidden purposes. Some theorists believe the pyramids could be a giant spiritual antenna, designed to connect humanity to cosmic or extraterrestrial forces. These theories often point to the precision of the pyramids' construction, their alignment with celestial bodies, and their scale as evidence that ancient civilizations had access to knowledge far beyond what we typically attribute to them. The idea that there could be hidden chambers or a vast underground city further fuels the notion that the pyramids may harbor ancient secrets, potentially functioning as spiritual or technological conduits to realms beyond Earth. These findings, if verified, would add another layer of mystery, potentially validating these alternative interpretations of Egypt’s ancient monuments.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202[/color]
Researchers from Italy and Scotland used advanced radar technology to produce detailed images from deep below the surface, revealing possible hidden structures 10 times the size of the pyramids themselves.
The report highlights eight distinct vertical, cylinder-shaped formations stretching over 2,100 feet beneath the pyramids, along with a series of additional unidentified structures located another 4,000 feet further down.
RE: Massive underground structure discovered beneath the pyramids of Giza - FlickerOfLight - 03-26-2025
Near the base of the pyramid, 5 identical structures are seen, connected by geometric pathways. Inside each of these are 5 horizontal levels and a sloping roof.
Below these 5 structures are 8 cylindrical structures which appear to be vertical wells, hollow inside, and surrounded by descending spiral pathways. These 8 vertically aligned cylindrical structures, arranged in two parallel rows from north to south, descend to a depth of 648 meters where they all merge into two large cubic structures measuring approximately 80 meters per side.
The entire structure extends approximately two kilometers beneath the surface. And extends beneath all three pyramids of the Giza Plateau complex
https://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/the-discovery-of-giant-structures-under-the-giza-pyramids-could-prove-that-a-whole-bunch-of-conspiracy-theories-are-actually-true/
Nikola Tesla believed that the pyramids could harness earth’s natural frequencies. This arguably inspired his experiments in wireless energy transmission and scalar waves.
In, “The Giza Power Plant,” Christopher Dunn argued that the Great Pyramid was a power-generating machine using resonant and acoustic forces to convert mechanical stress into electricity.
In, “The Giza Death Star,” Joseph Farrell proposed that the Great Pyramid of Giza was a weapon of mass destruction using a type of physics, that he calls “paleophysics,” to focus energy as a scalar weapon.
RE: Massive underground structure discovered beneath the pyramids of Giza - Harte - 03-13-2026
This entire thing is nothing but a scam. It is entirely based on news releases.
Complete malarky.
Harte
RE: Massive underground structure discovered beneath the pyramids of Giza - Freija - 03-13-2026
Glad to see you figured it out and made it, Harte. I hope some of my suggestions over at DI helped a little?
I struggle with believing anything. There are only a few YouTubers I regularly follow like History for Granite and Ancient Architects that I find to be mostly credible but I consider the majority of the rest as entertainment.
The guy in this video is new to me and I haven't seen enough of his content to determine if it is good or if he is just full of shit like most of the rest but i did find this video calling out "fantasy archeology" to be pretty good.
I'm sure there are other channels that are high quality but my interests are so varied I haven't found them yet. What are some of your sources?
RE: Massive underground structure discovered beneath the pyramids of Giza - OmegaLogos - 03-13-2026
Explanation: Lets have a look see at the current technology levels and see how far down they can actually see ok.
[NOTE: We are at least 50yrs behind the bleeding edge technology available to black secret projects run by the powers that be elite. Please TRUST me on that ok]
From and care-of Google search engine, the AI blurb it gave me ... ==>
Quote:Ground Penetrating Radar Depth by Application
The depth to which ground penetrating radar (GPR) can see downwards varies based on several factors, including soil composition, antenna frequency, and the size of the target being located. Here's a breakdown of the expected depths based on different applications:
- [b]Utility Locating[/b]: Mid-range antennas (around 250–400 MHz) can typically reach depths of 3 to 10 feet (1–3 meters) in dry sandy soils.
[/url]
[b]1[/b]
- [b]Concrete Scanning[/b]: High-frequency antennas (like 1600 MHz) can penetrate around 4 to 12 inches (10–30 cm) in concrete, depending on slab thickness and reinforcement.
[b]1[/b]
- [b]Environmental and Geological Surveys[/b]: Low-frequency antennas (50 to 250 MHz) can reach depths of 15 to 30 feet (4.5 to 9.1 meters) in clean, dry conditions.
[b]1[/b]
- [b]General GPR[/b]: In ideal conditions, GPR can reach depths of up to 100 feet (30 meters) in low-conductivity materials like dry sand or granite. (OL's EDIT: VERY SIGNIFICANT RESULT of 100ft or 30m max in prefered soil types such as dry sand and granite!)
[b]1[/b]
[url=https://www.bing.com/ck/a?!&&p=17a9b59589073a0146ffc017d45997cc02845220774c30af5600c039d2f989caJmltdHM9MTc3MzI3MzYwMA&ptn=3&ver=2&hsh=4&fclid=2076d0c0-43c8-6603-1383-c572420e6752&u=a1aHR0cHM6Ly9lbi53aWtpcGVkaWEub3JnL3dpa2kvR3JvdW5kLXBlbmV0cmF0aW5nX3JhZGFy&ntb=1]
These depths are general estimates and can vary based on the specific conditions and materials encountered during the GPR survey. It's important to consider these factors when interpreting GPR data and determining the depth of penetration.
So now we have that basic unrefined resulting answer we can start speculating at what the same technology 50+ years from now will be able to achieve ok. And that will give us a spectrum from most plausible to least plausible in range and where we each decide to tend to fall upon that spectrum can be revealed and then further debating points can be made to counter prior held debating points etc.
Personal Disclosure: I am going to say the most we can logically, reasonable and rationally hope for, as far as improvements to this technologies ability to its job, would be to double (+100%) its depth reading capacity and to also penetrate a far wider range of soil types (lets say double the current number of soil types ) with an increased accuracy (assuming an accuracy of currently better than 50% right reading / misleading 50% reading, & I suggest that a +10% to right reading & -10% to a misleading reading with a +5% in current accuracy is fair) and less margin of error (I suggest an error margin of +/- 0.5% in the readings output data)!
Therefor 30m becomes 60m and the number of preferred soil types is double from at least 2 (sand and granite) to 4 (+heavy clay and +limestone) and its increased accuracy would go from 60% read right and 40% misleading reading to 65% read right and 35% misleading with an error margin of +/1 0.5% in the readings output data! <== And thats the best we can hope for in +50 years time ahead.
Now if we look optimistically and use the techs least plausible improvements levels, as opposed to looking at it pessimistically and using the most plausible non improved levels, we would be dabbling in the land of pure Woo!
I personally don't mind that level of Woo! ok. BUT your mileage may vary and thats aok, as long as you can explain your reasons for holding such a position, then its all good!
I think and feel that Woo! is a very important view to at least entertain the idea and concepts of future advancements so as to get an idea of the biggest reasonable picture that we can all entertain together with.
