Quote:Our royal commentator Alastair Bruce explains that this latest move comes in part because the public considered previous measures insufficient, which affected the King's role.
"The King has a role to be a focus for national unity and clearly this issue was getting in the way of that," Bruce says.
"The initial move by the King to put the title and honours beyond use has been deemed by public reaction to be not sufficient."
This has made the King's latest decision inevitable, Bruce adds.
Now, Charles' brother will be "just an ordinary person without any form of exceptional name", he says.

https://news.sky.com/story/prince-andrew-to-lose-prince-title-and-move-out-of-royal-lodge-13456409

Quote:Republic, a pressure group which aims to see the monarchy abolished, said it had taken the "unprecedented step" of instructing a law firm to investigate the allegations and commence a private prosecution if appropriate.
https://news.sky.com/story/campaign-group-republic-considering-private-prosecution-against-prince-andrew-13460602

(11-01-2025, 04:54 PM)BIAD Wrote: The mainstream media bang-on about how they're brave when it comes to penetrating reporting
and yet, the chase for ratings insures that relevant damning information gets lost.

In his BBC interview of his alleged antics, Randy Andy is NEVER asked about these images below
by Emily Maitlis.

(11-01-2025, 07:07 PM)Ninurta Wrote: Forgive my ignorance, but what do the picture represent? I can see Mr. Windsor behind a half opened door, and a young lady of indeterminate activity outside the door, but what is it they are showing beyond the potential rejection of a door-to-door magazine subscription sale lady?

I have an imperfect understanding - the view from afar - of what is actually going on in Britain, or whether or not the British people will eventually rise up and demand the return of their nation and accountability from their government, and rely on this thread, and others of a similar nature at Rogue Nation to inform me as to those statuses.

But those images are new to me, and without proper context for us furriners...

Quote:'Standing by the towering 15ft-high solid oak front door, Prince Andrew gives a nod and a cheery
wave to the pretty brunette as she leaves the £63 million Manhattan mansion. He appears entirely
at ease but then, for a split second, glances around the door as if to check that no one had
witnessed the brief encounter.
As well he might.

For these exclusive pictures come from a never-before-seen video of the Duke of York staying at the
New York home of convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein. And some of the other images caught on
camera make for disturbing viewing.

The footage of the Duke of York – then the UK's Special Representative for International Trade – was
taken less than an hour after Epstein, who had been convicted of sex with a child in 2008, left the
house in the company of a young, shivering blonde woman.

The video was shot on December 6, 2010, during a visit by the Prince to Epstein's nine-storey 21,000
square foot mansion dubbed the 'House of Horrors' by many of his young victims. By then Epstein
– who took his own life last weekend – was on a child sex offender register, yet one observer told
The Mail on Sunday that several of the women leaving and entering the home while Andrew was
apparently inside 'looked very young indeed'.

The Duke has vehemently denied claims by Epstein's alleged 'sex slave' Virginia Roberts that she had
sex with the Prince on three occasions, the first when she was 17 and once at the US millionaire's
now-notorious 40-room mansion at 9 East 71st Street in Manhattan, the setting of these pictures.

Her allegations, submitted to a court in 2014, were later thrown out by a judge who ordered them to
be struck from the record as 'immaterial and impertinent'. Since Epstein's suicide last weekend as
he faced further child sex trafficking charges, Buckingham Palace has repeated its denial of
wrongdoing by the Prince.

'Any suggestion of impropriety with underage minors is categorically untrue. It is emphatically denied
that the Duke of York had any form of sexual contact or relationship with Virginia Roberts,' it said...'