We all know half of small businesses are LYING. The Economy is the best it has ever been.

 


https://justthenews.com/nation/economy/a...biden-term

Quote:When asked what changes small businesses would make in preparation for a second term under President Joe Biden, some answers included, "close by business" and "actively look at selling out to a larger competitor."

lmost 50% of small businesses say they likely will not survive another Biden presidential term and see stagflation as inevitable, according to a new Freedom Economy Index survey. 

The survey, a product of the Red Balloon job site and the Public Square shopping site, was released Thursday and found that 22.4% of businesses said they definitely wouldn't survive another Biden term while 26.2% said they probably would not survive. 


The Consumer Price index reported that while inflation eased a little in the month of April, consumer prices are still increased at an annualized rate of 3.4%, according to CNBC News. 


When asked what changes small businesses would make in preparation for a second term under President Joe Biden, some answers included, "close my business" and "actively look at selling out to a larger competitor."

The Freedom Economy Index also surveyed small businesses' opinion on House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., and 40% said his performance has been "highly disappointing" and 15.3% said it was "poor."


Earlier this month, the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly to table a petition to remove Johnson as speaker, as Republicans in the House Freedom Caucus have been disappointed in his performance after different foreign aid bills were passed. 


The survey was conducted April 30 to May 10 and surveyed 80,000 small business owners and had 754 respondents with a 4% margin of error at the 95% confidence level. 

Funny....

About damned time. Let's hope other join in the fun.

https://x.com/PeterSweden7/status/1791166765201801309

Quote:HUGE NEWS

The state of Louisiana just voted to BAN the WEF and WHO agenda.

Saying that they shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state.

The bill now passed both the Senate and the House.

This is MASSIVE news yet nobody in the mainstream media is reporting on it.

That's why I'm here, to bring you the news that is being censored by the mainstream media.

Earlier, the Senate in Louisiana voted 37 - 0 to pass a bill that will BAN the WEF, WHO and the UN from having any jurisdiction or power within the state.

Now, the House have also voted 69 - 22 in favor of the bill. This is massive news.

Here is what it says in the bill.

"The World Health Organization, United Nations and the World Economic Forum shall have no jurisdiction or power within the state of Louisiana. No rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy or mandate of any kind of the World Health Organization, United Nations and the World Economic Forum shall be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency, department, board, commission, political subdivision, governmental entity of the state, parish, municipality, or any other political entity".

Looks like they are rejecting not only the WEF agenda, but also the WHO and UN agenda.

This comes as 22 State Attorney Generals have called to reject the WHO pandemic treaty, and several Australian politicians have done so as well.

We are seeing more and more people saying NO.

Quote:BREAKING: Louisiana House has passed the bill, 69-22, that previously passed the state Senate to not allow any rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate of any kind from the WHO, UN, or WEF to be enforced or implemented by the state of Louisiana or any agency.

Quote:In a significant move, the Louisiana House recently passed a bill with a vote of 69-22 that prohibits the enforcement or implementation of any rule, regulation, fee, tax, policy, or mandate from the World Health Organization (WHO), United Nations (UN), or World Economic Forum (WEF) within the state of Louisiana or by any of its agencies. This decision marks a clear stance by the state legislature to maintain autonomy and sovereignty over its own governance and decision-making processes.

This bill has stirred up a considerable amount of debate and discussion among lawmakers, stakeholders, and the general public. Supporters of the bill argue that it is crucial for the state to retain control over its own policies and regulations without external influence from international organizations. They believe that this measure will help protect the interests and values of the people of Louisiana.
On the other hand, critics of the bill express concerns about the potential implications of isolating the state from global standards and initiatives. They argue that international cooperation and collaboration are essential in addressing global challenges such as public health, climate change, and economic development. By restricting the influence of organizations like the WHO, UN, and WEF, Louisiana could be limiting its access to valuable resources, information, and expertise.
The passing of this bill reflects a broader trend of states asserting their independence and pushing back against perceived overreach from international bodies. In recent years, there has been a growing skepticism towards global governance and a renewed focus on national sovereignty. Louisiana’s decision to limit the authority of external organizations within its borders is part of this larger movement towards decentralization and self-determination.
It is important to note that this bill does not mean that Louisiana is completely cutting ties with the WHO, UN, or WEF. Rather, it is a statement of intent to prioritize state-level decision-making and to carefully consider the implications of external regulations and mandates. The state will still have the ability to engage with these organizations on a case-by-case basis and to participate in international initiatives that align with its interests and values.
Moving forward, it will be interesting to see how this bill is implemented and what impact it will have on the state of Louisiana. Will other states follow suit and pass similar legislation? How will this decision affect Louisiana’s relationships with international partners and organizations? These are questions that will likely be explored in the coming months as the implications of this bill unfold.
In conclusion, the passing of this bill by the Louisiana House represents a significant development in the ongoing debate over state sovereignty and international cooperation. By asserting its independence from external influences, Louisiana is sending a clear message about its commitment to self-governance and autonomy. Whether this decision will have positive or negative consequences remains to be seen, but it is certainly a bold move that will shape the state’s future trajectory.

More poison food.


https://www.fastcompany.com/91127185/tar...s-loophole

Quote:The finding, which comes two years after hundreds of people were sickened, could offer hope for a broken system that allows chemicals into our foods.

This week’s announcement from the Food and Drug Administration declaring that tara flour is “generally not recognized as safe” and illegal to use could spell hope for a broken food system that enables unchecked chemicals and food additives to be put into America’s food products.

The FDA’s determination about tara flour comes two years after almost 500 people were sickened from consuming the ingredient in Daily Harvest’s French Lentil + Leek Crumbles. At least 39 of those people had their gallbladders removed. 
Tara flour is a new plant-based protein ingredient made from seeds of the South American tree Tara spinosa. The FDA’s announcement about it wasn’t unexpected, because preliminary data following the outbreak pointed to this as the likely source of illness.
“This FDA report is consistent with the findings from our own root cause analysis that led us to discontinue the use of tara flour in mid-2022,” a spokesperson for Daily Harvest told [i]Fast Company[/i] when asked for comment.
But at least one food safety expert hopes that the FDA’s determination offers a sign that the agency will take a closer look at other food manufacturers’ chemicals and ingredients.
“This is encouraging,” says Brian Ronholm, former deputy undersecretary of food safety at the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the current head of food policy at Consumer Reports. “So hopefully they’ll be able to continue to do this type of work because I think, ultimately, they’re going to be concerned by what they find.”
A BROKEN SYSTEM FOR DECIDING WHAT’S SAFE
Currently, food makers are not required to submit to the FDA any data demonstrating their safety of additives under the secret “generally recognized as safe,” or GRAS, loophole, which allows companies to self-certify that chemical additives and ingredients used in food are safe. Over the past several decades, the agency has lacked the willingness and funding to perform such post-market assessments on ingredients.


Yet today, 75% of America’s food is processed, filled with a laundry list of artificial and chemical ingredients. 
“There has been no way for consumers to know the safety of these chemicals because there’s zero transparency with the industry,” says Ronholm. “It’s primarily a voluntary system.”
When Congress passed the GRAS law in 1958, lawmakers assumed that the FDA would review the data, but as more ingredients began hitting the market, it became too overwhelming for the agency. It ultimately allowed food and chemical makers to decide for themselves that foods were safe. 



Lawmakers are also concerned about what’s going into American food products. U.S. Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts and U.S. Representative Jan Schakowsky of Illinois, both Democrats, recently introduced bills that ensure “toxic free foods” and close the loophole for industry self-policing of food safety.
States are also taking action. A proposed bill in New York would require companies to post safety information to the state’s Department of Agriculture and Markets, giving consumers and scientists access to the data to check a company’s assumptions.
“It’s a process that tries to call companies’ bluff,” Ronholm says. 

California already passed the California Food Safety Act, which bans the use of four food additives, including red dye No. 3, while another proposed state measure would ban artificial food coloring in public schools. Other states, including Pennsylvania and Illinois, are following suit with similar food safety measures.
For its part, the food industry is shifting more focus toward creating minimally processed and clean ingredients. At least 75% of consumers say they’ll pay more for a clean label. Food companies are working to remove chemical additives while preserving shelf life, and in the past two years 8 in 10 manufacturers have reformulated clean labels. 
“Ideally,” Ronholm says, “companies don’t want to put unsafe products on the market and destroy their brand, but you do have to question how diligent they are in the process.”

I have not been to Europe since the mid 1990's. Sounds like it had really changed. If these stats are real, this is insanity.


THE ISLAMIC NEW WORLD ORDER IS HERE - Europe has fallen

Remember all the lies Fauci said while looking directly at the camera .. ?

Appears we have lots of stories of cancer being cured with Fenbendazole and Ivermectin, cheap stuff that nobody can make money on yet so many reputable people including renowned surgeons put their reputations in jeopardy to tell us about it.

https://slaynews.com/news/renowned-oncol...es-cancer/

Quote:A world-renowned American surgical oncologist has just revealed that ivermectin has successfully cured cancer in multiple patients.



Cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy announced that the miracle drug has been used to save the lives of terminally ill patients.


Dr. Ruddy revealed that the so-called “horse dewormer” has stunned doctors by triggering dramatic recoveries in those suffering late-stage cancer.


Ruddy said the drug was tried on three patients who had exhausted all other cancer treatments.
She revealed that the patients went from their deathbeds to making a full recovery and being completely cancer-free in under a year after taking ivermectin.

One patient had a grim future when the cancer had spread so much that he was expected to soon die.
This man had stage four prostate cancer, Ruddy explains.
He had tried all the conventional protocols before doctors told him that there was nothing more they could do.
When the man had nothing left to lose, he started taking ivermectin and the results were astonishing.


Within six months, the metastatic lesions began to disappear, according to Dr. Ruddy.

In under a year, “he was out dancing for four hours,” three nights per week, she revealed.

Just for fun, who thinks this will actually happen? Even with the crazy "restrictions" Biden is setting up with "MSM Only", I cannot believe they will let him actually debate.

If... big IF it actually happens (which I doubt), I assume it will only be allowed to go with pre scripted questions to Biden that he will read the answer, no Trump rebuttal, muting his microphone constantly and the "moderator" will try to crush Trump with gotcha questions on January 6th, abortion, court cases, etc.

The "Rules" the Biden team is setting....

1) President Biden's team does not want former President Trump to be able to interrupt the president

2) President Biden's team is demanding that there be no audience at any debate with former President Donald Trump.

3)  Must take place in a television studio with just the candidates and the moderator present.

4) No RFK Jr. or any other 3rd-party candidates

5) Biden's demands limit the number of major news outlets that can host a 2024 presidential debate.

6) Microphones be muted once their allotted speaking time expires. I am sure they won't mute anything they don't like as "inappropriate". 

Quote:May 10, 2024 / Joseph P. Farrell

But why do I say stories? Very simple: today's blog started out as a blog about a fire at a German firm in Belin-Lichterfelde named Diehl, but the story quickly morphed into something else.  When I first heard of the story of the fire at the Diehl Metal Applications plant in Berlin-Lichterfelde, my ears perked up because of the general location. Berlin-Lichterfelde was the home prior to and during the war of self-taught Nazi nuclear physicist Baron Manfred von Ardenne, who managed to build for himself a functioning cyclotron underneath his (rather large) house, and with that cyclotron he devised an ingenious means of uranium enrichment very similar to E.O. Lawrence's beta calutrons in the American Manhattan project. And of course, von Ardenne was doing so for the same reason.  Intriguingly, it was von Ardenne that alone of Germany's nuclear scientists, we know that Adolf Hitler personally visited, and on a regular basis. After the war, von Ardenne, unlike most high-ranking Nazi scientists, opted to cooperate with the Soviet Union, presumably on its atom bomb project. Whatever von Ardenne did, he gained the considerable appreciation and gratitude of the Soviets, for he was the only foreign scientist ever to win the "Stalin Prize" for science, the Soviet Union's equivalent of a Nobel prize, for the work he had done, "whatever" that was. He returned to East Germany and Berlin-Lichterfelde, and the Soviets shocked the world by detonating their bomb well ahead of western predictions.

So, a fire at a German metallurgical plant located in Berlin-Lichterfelde grabbed my attention, and sure enough, it soon came out that the firm of Diehl Metal Applications was connected to the German defense industry infrascture... and more:

https://www.defensemirror.com/news/36714...ens_Berlin

The "and more" part of the story is this:

Quote:Diehl Metal Applications is a subsidiary of Diehl, known for its involvement in the defense industry, including the production of IRIS-T air defense systems supplied to (the) Ukraine.

Now, when I first heard the story, my immediate thought was that this fire was perhaps an example of what I've been warning about: increased use of active covert operations measures by Russia against the West in response to the West's insistence that it is allowed to meddle in the Ukraine and that that Russians should be nice boys and girls and let them do so, and sit there and be quiet. The direct Ukrainian connection here only served to intensify my speculation.

But no sooner had this fire occurred than a few days later we got this encyclical from the cardinals at NATO:

Hybrid war: NATO sounds alarm over 'hostile' Russian activity across Europe



Now note what this "hybrid war" consists of, according to the article:

Quote:NATO has issued a sharp warning over "hostile" Russian activity across Europe.

In a statement released on Thursday, the 32-member military alliance said it was "deeply concerned about recent malign activities" by Moscow, which it called a threat to Western security.

It pointed to "disinformation, sabotage, acts of violence, cyber and electronic interference... and other hybrid operations."

Czechia, Estonia, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and the UK have all been affected, according to NATO.

So it has finally happened folks. For years I've been warning that the West's and NATO's actions would eventually provoke a Russian response in kind, and that "two can play the covert operations game." And now NATO is confirming that, indeed, Russia has begun to respond in kind.

Or at least, that is what we're being told. Bear with me, for I have two wildly different high octane speculations to advance. Let's assume that Russia is responding and is conducting such covert operations. Just how, and when, they will escalate to include what the west has already done to the Ukraine and Russia - such as an actual coup d'etat against a foreign government (the Ukraine), or assassination attempts (remember Putin's chauffeur and the strange car accident in Moscow? or blowing up Alexander Dugin's daughter?) - remains to be seen. But it should be obvious that, when those types of actions are considered, Russia has only begun to horizontally "escalate". When western leaders' chauffeurs start having accidents on Trafalgar Square or in the traffic circle at the Arc de Triomphe or in front of the Kanzleramt or drones start dropping on Davos  or there are sudden outbreaks of "turbocancers" in the NATO College of Cardinals, we'll know something is definitely afoot.  My point in advancing this is simply this: my long-predicted "two can play this game" response has arrived, and NATO is officially acknowledging that it has arrived, and that the covert wars have begun in earnest. But my main point is that, while NATO and the West have been playing this vicious war against Russia for years, Russia has only just begun to respond. In other words, expect matters to escalate dramatically, and that escalation I predict will include actual "wet works" against western leadership. After all, as far as the Russians are concerned, they have made themselves targets.

And this bring me to my second concern, which is the opportunity for false flags, and indeed, we need to ask the question: are we looking at a Russian response at all, or only at something being blamed on Russia, but actually perpetrated by the West to further its own escalation agenda? Answer: I don't know, and no one does, but we have to maintain the possibility because every institution in the west is co-opted, has proven itself capable of bottomless corruption, endless lying, and blatantly murderous deeds.  The whole Ukrainian fiasco has been a tale precisely of bottomless corruption, endless lying, and blatantly murderous deeds.   In fact, I am bold to suggest that until specific western leaders or their chauffeurs start experiencing curious accidents, sudden onset cancers, or accidental explosions, there's really not much to suggest that "Putin did it."  And that should give everyone a bit of pause before buying any narrative from the swamps of the West, be they Brussels, Paris, London, Berlin, or Swampington DC.

I live in the woods with the the quickest route to what most would call civilization being about 20 miles away.

Civilization is quickly closing in on us and our remoteness will be history in a blink of an eye, very soon. So being presented with a two hour video is not daunting in the least, if it is worth my time. Which I already admitted is comes at a variable price.

I am sortf of glad this video @"VioletDove"#12  has suggested to us, is so long, because it requires it to be viewed when you have time available. It really needs to be viewed when you have the time to not just watch it but to process it.

At it's face value alone, it needs to be viewed to separate the wheat from the chaff, but considering it was taped seven years ago, opens up a whole new door for consideration, and it needs to be viewed from a completely new perspective.

I think this is a must watch.

Thanks @"VioletDove"#12. It got me through my daily exercises, I am still watching, and it has given me a lot to reexamine.