He mentions Lew Elizondo quite a lot, by which I take it Elizondo figures pretty prominently in the original film.
Lew Elizondo is a shill. He is an intelligence asset, wholly and entirely owned by them. While he does occasionally mix fact in with his propaganda fantasies, it's safe to say that nothing that comes out of his mouth can be trusted. If Lew speaks it, it's a fair bet that it is propaganda, designed to lead the listener in one direction, a direction that is far removed from truth.
Likewise, the very word "disclosure" is a keyword in a PSYOPS context created by intel agencies. To even hear it means that you are being led astray by the one who is promising "disclosure". It has become so prevalent now that most of the people using it do not even realize they are being turned into unwitting shills of the intel agencies - they actually think they are providing a service to the people, when in reality they are simply being used as conduits for a slow dissemination of propaganda meant to lead the people away from the truth, a conduit owned and controlled by people who do not have your best interests at heart.
There will be NO "disclosure", not as it's being presented, from any governmental agency. If it ever comes, it will come from the entities themselves, not the government or governments. The sooner folks realize that - if they ever do - the sooner they cam get back on track and start moving towards "truth" once again. There is NO Truth in "Disclosure". None. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. If you hear anyone use that word, don't waste your time listening to anything else they have to say.
Consider: when has this alleged "Disclosure", in all of the years of it's use, EVER actually disclosed anything at all? It's just a bell intended to keep Pavlov's Dogs continually salivating without ever actually feeding them.
Personally, any time I hear the words "Elizondo" or "disclosure",followed by claims of previously unknown UFO "fact",I mentally mark everything that follows them as pure, unadulterated bullshit. Just like the phrase "Zeta Reticuli" when referring to gray aliens. If anyone claims Grays come from Zeta Reticuli, it is safe to assume that everything else they say after that is also bullshit. The Hill starmap that they are basing that assessment on does not show Zeta Reticuli at all. In the most likely scenario, it shows Beta Comae Berenieces, but even that is not confirmation that the Grays come from that star, either - it's just a map. I can show you a map of Denver, Colorado, but that does not mean I came from Denver.
Fact is, I might be trying to conceal my true origin point when I do that, y'know?
ETA: the entity that allegedly showed Betty Hill the original starmap never, at any point, claimed to be from the depicted star system. Instead, he asked Betty if she knew where the sun was on that map, and when she answered no, commented that since she did not even know where she was, how could she ever understand where he came from? That is not a claim of an origin point, it's an acknowledgement that she would not be able to comprehend his origin. Any assumptions folks make or conclusions jumped to beyond those bare statements are entirely their own, not objective "Fact".
.
Lew Elizondo is a shill. He is an intelligence asset, wholly and entirely owned by them. While he does occasionally mix fact in with his propaganda fantasies, it's safe to say that nothing that comes out of his mouth can be trusted. If Lew speaks it, it's a fair bet that it is propaganda, designed to lead the listener in one direction, a direction that is far removed from truth.
Likewise, the very word "disclosure" is a keyword in a PSYOPS context created by intel agencies. To even hear it means that you are being led astray by the one who is promising "disclosure". It has become so prevalent now that most of the people using it do not even realize they are being turned into unwitting shills of the intel agencies - they actually think they are providing a service to the people, when in reality they are simply being used as conduits for a slow dissemination of propaganda meant to lead the people away from the truth, a conduit owned and controlled by people who do not have your best interests at heart.
There will be NO "disclosure", not as it's being presented, from any governmental agency. If it ever comes, it will come from the entities themselves, not the government or governments. The sooner folks realize that - if they ever do - the sooner they cam get back on track and start moving towards "truth" once again. There is NO Truth in "Disclosure". None. Zero. Zip. Zilch. Nada. If you hear anyone use that word, don't waste your time listening to anything else they have to say.
Consider: when has this alleged "Disclosure", in all of the years of it's use, EVER actually disclosed anything at all? It's just a bell intended to keep Pavlov's Dogs continually salivating without ever actually feeding them.
Personally, any time I hear the words "Elizondo" or "disclosure",followed by claims of previously unknown UFO "fact",I mentally mark everything that follows them as pure, unadulterated bullshit. Just like the phrase "Zeta Reticuli" when referring to gray aliens. If anyone claims Grays come from Zeta Reticuli, it is safe to assume that everything else they say after that is also bullshit. The Hill starmap that they are basing that assessment on does not show Zeta Reticuli at all. In the most likely scenario, it shows Beta Comae Berenieces, but even that is not confirmation that the Grays come from that star, either - it's just a map. I can show you a map of Denver, Colorado, but that does not mean I came from Denver.
Fact is, I might be trying to conceal my true origin point when I do that, y'know?
ETA: the entity that allegedly showed Betty Hill the original starmap never, at any point, claimed to be from the depicted star system. Instead, he asked Betty if she knew where the sun was on that map, and when she answered no, commented that since she did not even know where she was, how could she ever understand where he came from? That is not a claim of an origin point, it's an acknowledgement that she would not be able to comprehend his origin. Any assumptions folks make or conclusions jumped to beyond those bare statements are entirely their own, not objective "Fact".
.
“Trouble rather the tiger in his lair than the sage among his books. For to you kingdoms and their armies are things mighty and enduring, but to him they are but toys of the moment, to be overturned with the flick of a finger.”
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake
― Gordon R. Dickson, Tactics of Mistake